[2024] KEHC 1867 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 1867 (KLR)

The court determined that it was just and prudent to first hear and determine the application dated 13th February, 2024, which seeks a stay of the orders of 20th December, 2023, before proceeding to mitigation and sentencing in the contempt proceedings. The court found that since there is a pending appeal and an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 1867 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: County Secretary Nairobi City County; Respondent: Chief Officer Finance, County Treasurer Nairobi City County; Applicant: Tom Ojienda & Associates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 121 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions Regarding Sentencing and Stay Application
Outcome
Application for stay to be determined first; mitigation and sentencing deferred.
Judges
JM Chigiti
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Judicial Review Procedure, Stay of Execution, Mitigation and Sentencing
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Contempt of Court Judicial Review Procedure Stay of Execution Mitigation and Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

County Secretary Nairobi City County

Respondent

Chief Officer Finance, County Treasurer Nairobi City County

Respondent

Tom Ojienda & Associates

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions Regarding Sentencing and Stay Application

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 13th February, 2024 seeking stay of the orders of 20th December, 2023 should be heard before sentencing.
  2. 2 Whether mitigation and sentencing should await the outcome of the application for stay pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that it was just and prudent to first hear and determine the application dated 13th February, 2024, which seeks a stay of the orders of 20th December, 2023, before proceeding to mitigation and sentencing in the contempt proceedings. The court found that since there is a pending appeal and an application for stay, it would be appropriate for mitigation and sentencing to abide the outcome of the ruling on the application. The court also directed the personal attendance of the relevant officers for purposes of mitigation and sentencing, should the application not succeed. These directions were extended to a related matter, Misc. JR. No. 123/2017.

Court Disposition

Application for stay to be determined first; mitigation and sentencing deferred.

Orders

  • The application dated 13th February, 2024 shall be determined on 18th March, 2024.
  • Mitigation and sentencing shall abide the outcome of the ruling on the application.