[2021] KEHC 654 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 654 (KLR)

The court found that despite the issuance and repeated extension of a warrant of arrest against the 2nd accused, she has not been apprehended or produced in court. The surety has also failed to fulfill their obligation to ensure the accused's attendance. The court emphasized the necessity of executing its orders,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 654 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Dancan Livingstone Kimanthi; Defendant: Winnie Wanjiku
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 50 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Directions After Part Heard; 2nd Accused Absent; Warrant Outstanding; Awaiting Compliance With Summons
Outcome
Directions issued; compliance with previous orders required before further substantive orders.
Judges
GL Nzioka
Legal Topics
Failure to Attend Court, Warrant of Arrest, Surety Liability, Case Management
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Failure to Attend Court Warrant of Arrest Surety Liability Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Dancan Livingstone Kimanthi

Defendant

Winnie Wanjiku

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Directions After Part Heard; 2nd Accused Absent; Warrant Outstanding; Awaiting Compliance With Summons

  1. 1 Whether the case against the 2nd accused should proceed in her absence or be withdrawn.
  2. 2 Whether the court's orders for the DCIO to be summoned have been executed.
  3. 3 Whether the surety for the 2nd accused has fulfilled their obligations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that despite the issuance and repeated extension of a warrant of arrest against the 2nd accused, she has not been apprehended or produced in court. The surety has also failed to fulfill their obligation to ensure the accused's attendance. The court emphasized the necessity of executing its orders, particularly the service of summons on the DCIO Kasarani, to facilitate the tracing of the 2nd accused. The Deputy Registrar was directed to ensure compliance, with a warning that failure to do so constitutes contempt. The court deferred final orders on the continuity of the matter pending confirmation of service and the DCIO's availability.

Court Disposition

Directions issued; compliance with previous orders required before further substantive orders.

Orders

  • Deputy Registrar to ensure service of summons on DCIO Kasarani forthwith.
  • Confirmation of service and DCIO's availability to be reported to the court.