[2008] KEHC 1282 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused persons, Daniel Kioko Maweu and Abedneko Musau Maingi, sufficient to require them to be put on their defence. This decision was made after reviewing the evidence on record and in accordance with Section 306 of the Criminal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 1282 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Daniel Kioko Maweu; Defendant: Abedneko Musau Maingi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 72 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused persons found to have a case to answer; ordered to be put on their defence.
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Section 306 Criminal Procedure Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Daniel Kioko Maweu
Defendant
Abedneko Musau Maingi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to require them to be put on their defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused persons, Daniel Kioko Maweu and Abedneko Musau Maingi, sufficient to require them to be put on their defence. This decision was made after reviewing the evidence on record and in accordance with Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that if at the close of the prosecution's case the court is of the opinion that there is evidence sufficient to put the accused on their defence, it shall call upon them to do so. The court therefore ruled that the accused have a case to answer.
Court Disposition
Accused persons found to have a case to answer; ordered to be put on their defence.
Orders
- The accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are to be put on their defence.
- Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code to be complied with.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MACHAKOS
Criminal Case 72 of 2004
REPUBLIC
VERSUS
1. DANIEL KIOKO MAWEU
2. ABEDNEKO MUSAU MAINGI ..…………... ACCUSED
RULING
1. I have now read the evidence on record in this matter. It is my view that the Republic has made out a prima facie case to warrant the accused persons being put in their respective defences. They have a case to answer in any event.
2. Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code to be complied with.
3. Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 24thday of September2008.
ISAAC LENAOLA
JUDGE