[2020] KEHC 3 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, Daniel Kipkemoi Maritim. Consequently, the accused is required to be placed on his defence in accordance with Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court therefore ruled that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 3 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Daniel Kipkemoi Maritim
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case Case17 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to be placed on his defence.
- Judges
- AN Ongeri
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Section 211 Criminal Procedure Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Daniel Kipkemoi Maritim
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to require him to be placed on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, Daniel Kipkemoi Maritim. Consequently, the accused is required to be placed on his defence in accordance with Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court therefore ruled that the accused has a case to answer and directed that the defence hearing be scheduled.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to be placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
- Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code to be complied with.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO
CRIMINAL CASE NO.17 OF 2017
REPUBLIC...............................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
DANIEL KIPKEMOI MARITIM...................................ACCUSED
RULING
1. Upon considering the evidence adduced by the prosecution in this case, this court finds that the prosecution has established a prima facie case to warrant the Accused person to be place on his defense.
2. This court rules that the Accused person has a case to answer.
3. Section 211 to be complied with.
4. Defence hearing on 6/12/2021.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KERICHO THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021.
A. N. ONGERI
JUDGE