[2012] KEHC 228 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 228 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, David Chemusian, murdered Joseph Chemyamis Kibagut and Josephine Kiprop Kabon (Counts I and II). Multiple eyewitnesses testified to seeing the accused strike the deceased with stones on the head, causing fatal injuries. The identification was positive, occurring in broad daylight, and the accused was known to the witnesses. The accused's alibi was discredited by contradictions in his own statements and the corroborated evidence placing him at the scene. The court found no sufficient evidence to convict on Counts III and IV, as no witnesses placed the accused at those scenes. The severity of the...

Citation
[2012] KEHC 228 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Republic; Appellant: David Chemusian
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
18 December 2012
Case Number
Criminal Case 38 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Judgment
Outcome
conviction on Counts I and II for murder; acquittal on Counts III and IV
Legal Topics
Murder, Actus Reus, Mens Rea, Identification, Malice Aforethought
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Respondent

David Chemusian

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed murder on Counts I and II.
  2. 2 Whether the accused was properly identified as the perpetrator of the offences.
  3. 3 Whether the accused had the requisite mens rea (malice aforethought) for murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, David Chemusian, murdered Joseph Chemyamis Kibagut and Josephine Kiprop Kabon (Counts I and II). Multiple eyewitnesses testified to seeing the accused strike the deceased with stones on the head, causing fatal injuries. The identification was positive, occurring in broad daylight, and the accused was known to the witnesses. The accused's alibi was discredited by contradictions in his own statements and the corroborated evidence placing him at the scene. The court found no sufficient evidence to convict on Counts III and IV, as no witnesses placed the accused at those scenes. The severity of the...

Court Disposition

conviction on Counts I and II for murder; acquittal on Counts III and IV

Orders

  • The accused is found guilty of murder on Counts I and II and is convicted accordingly under Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
  • The accused is acquitted on Counts III and IV for lack of sufficient evidence.