[2015] KEHC 3649 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3649 (KLR)

The court found that, upon reviewing the testimonies of all seven prosecution witnesses, including the medical and investigative evidence, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against all the accused persons. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence, as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3649 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: David Manoah Olando; Defendant: Isaac Manoah; Defendant: Godrine Matere; Defendant: Timothy Makokha; Defendant: Hezron Mukwami Lucheveleli; Defendant: Enock Jeremiah Ashikhanga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 40 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Case / Ruling on Whether a Prima Facie Case Has Been Established at the Close of Prosecution Case
Outcome
All six living accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are put on their defence.
Legal Topics
Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Prima Facie Case Burden of Proof Criminal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

David Manoah Olando

Defendant

Isaac Manoah

Defendant

Godrine Matere

Defendant

Timothy Makokha

Defendant

Hezron Mukwami Lucheveleli

Defendant

Enock Jeremiah Ashikhanga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Murder Case / Ruling on Whether a Prima Facie Case Has Been Established at the Close of Prosecution Case

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to require them to be put on their defence.
  2. 2 Whether any of the accused persons should be acquitted at the close of the prosecution case.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, upon reviewing the testimonies of all seven prosecution witnesses, including the medical and investigative evidence, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against all the accused persons. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence, as there was a case to answer. The court rejected the defence's submission that there was no evidence linking the accused to the offence, holding that the threshold for a prima facie case had been met. Accordingly, the court ordered that each of the six living accused persons be put on their defence, with the option to give sworn or unsworn evidence or to remain silent, and the...

Court Disposition

All six living accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are put on their defence.

Orders

  • Each of the six accused persons is put on their defence.
  • Accused persons may choose to give sworn or unsworn evidence or remain silent.