[2018] KEHC 7209 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called seven witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused for the charge of murder. Applying the standard from RAMANLAL BHATT vs. R and section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court held that the evidence, if uncontroverted, would justify a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 7209 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: David Mwaki Kalunge
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 13 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to be put on his defence.
- Judges
- F Gikonyo
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Murder Trial, Burden of Proof, Presumption of Innocence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
David Mwaki Kalunge
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being put on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution, if uncontroverted, would lead to a conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called seven witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused for the charge of murder. Applying the standard from RAMANLAL BHATT vs. R and section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court held that the evidence, if uncontroverted, would justify a conviction. Therefore, the accused must be put on his defence and informed of his rights to address the court, give evidence, or call witnesses. This ensures the accused's right to a fair trial and upholds the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to be put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is informed of his right to address the court, give evidence on his own behalf, make an unsworn statement, and call witnesses in his defence.
- The accused or his advocate shall state whether it is intended to call any witnesses other than the accused person himself.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
CRIMINAL CASE NO.13 OF 2014
REPUBLIC.......................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
DAVID MWAKI KALUNGE..................................ACCUSED
RULING
No case to answer
[1] The prosecution closed its case on 21st February, 2018. I should now determine whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused as to be called upon to enter on his defence. Here, I am guided by section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code which provides that:-
306. (1) When the evidence of the witnesses for the prosecution has been concluded, the court, if it considers that there is no evidence that the accused or any one of several accused committed the offence shall, after hearing, if necessary, any arguments which the advocate for the prosecution or the defence may desire to submit, record a finding of not guilty.
(2) When the evidence of the witnesses for the prosecution has been concluded, the court, if it considers that there is evidence that the accused person or any one or more of several accused persons committed the offence, shall inform each such accused person of his right to address the court, either personally or by his advocate (if any), to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make an unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence, and in all cases shall require him or his advocate (if any) to state whether it is intended to call any witnesses as to fact other than the accused person himself; and upon being informed thereof, the judge shall record the fact.
(3) If the accused person says that he does not intend to give evidence or make an unsworn statement, or to adduce evidence, then the advocate for the prosecution may sum up the case against the accused person; but if the accused person says that he intends to give evidence or make an unsworn statement, or to adduce evidence, the court shall call upon him to enter upon his defence.
[2] This exercise is not merely mundane ritual; it is an essential part of criminal trial, for it ensures that no one continues to stand trial unless a prima facie case has been established against him at the close of the prosecution’s case. This requirement is founded upon the right to fair trial and gives effect to the presumption of innocence of the accused at all stages of trial.
Prima facie case
[3] We learnt this subject in our early stages of university education in criminal law. But, the subject remains as important today as it has always been in modern criminal justice. Prima facie case is:-
‘’…one which a reasonable tribunal properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence would convict if no explanation is offered by the defence’’. See RAMANLAL BHATT vs. R (1957) EA 332(CA)
[4] The accused is facing a charge of murder charges. Seven witnesses gave evidence for the prosecution. Upon perusal of the said evidenceadduced, there is a prima facie case established against the accused. Accordingly, the accused is hereby informed of his right to address the court, either personally or by his advocate, to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make an unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence. Now the accused or his advocate shall state to the court whether it is intended to call any witnesses other than the accused person himself. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Meru this 2ndday of May 2018
--------------------
F. GIKONYO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Kiarie advocate for State
M/s. Athieno for accused
------------------------------
F. GIKONYO
JUDGE