[2016] KEHC 158 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, taken as a whole, established a prima facie case against both accused persons. The testimonies of the deceased's family members established a history of threats and animosity from the first accused. The investigating officer's evidence linked the accused to the crime...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 158 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: David Ngasura Nyamongo; Defendant: Thomas Aranga Nyandibi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 69 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Murder Trial / Ruling on No Case to Answer
- Outcome
- accused persons found to have a case to answer; put on their defence
- Judges
- CB Nagillah
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Confession Evidence, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
David Ngasura Nyamongo
Defendant
Thomas Aranga Nyandibi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Murder Trial / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant putting them on their defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced links the accused persons to the murder of Hellen Nyamongo.
- 3 Whether the confession by the second accused is admissible and sufficient to establish involvement in the offence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, taken as a whole, established a prima facie case against both accused persons. The testimonies of the deceased's family members established a history of threats and animosity from the first accused. The investigating officer's evidence linked the accused to the crime through phone records, and the confession of the second accused, properly recorded by a police officer, directly implicated both accused in the murder. The court held that this evidence was sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence, as it established a case to answer under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court was satisfied that the...
Court Disposition
accused persons found to have a case to answer; put on their defence
Orders
- Both accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are put on their defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAMIRA
MURDER CASE NO. 69 OF 2015
REPUBLIC……………….……………………………….….STATE
VERSUS
1. DAVID NGASURA NYAMONGO} …………..1ST ACCUSED
2. THOMAS ARANGA NYANDIBI}…………….2ND ACCUSED
RULING
This is a ruling of the court of the application of no-case to answer.
The case dates back to 2010. There were two cases, case No. 90 of 2010 and 97 of 2010. They were, however, consolidated into Criminal Case 123 of 2011in Kisii High Court.
Upon being transferred to Nyamira high Court, the case is now No.69 of 2015.
While in Kisii High Court, the case was handled by five judges, Judge M.A Makhandia, Judge Lagat Korir, Judge RN. Sitati, Judge M. Mureithi and Judge C.B. Nagillah.
The 1st accused, David Ngasora Nyamongowas charged on 18th October, 2010 with murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence were that on 15th May 2010 at Obwari Location in Nyamira District within Nyanza Province with others not before court murdered HELLEN NYAMONGO.
The 2nd accused, Thomas Aranga Nyandiba alias Athony,on 1st November 2010 with Murder contrary to Section 203 as readwith Section 204of the Penal Code.
The particulars of the offence were on the 15th October 2010 at Obwari Location in Nyamira District within Nyanza province with others not before court murdered HELLEN NYAMONGO.
Both accused persons denied the charge.
The case was therefore slated for hearing.
On 25th day of February, 2014 the hearing commenced.
P.W.I-Charles Ombati Nyambega,the brother of the deceased
Hellen Kerubo Nyamongo,stated how his sister has domestic quarrels and fights, to the extent she lived apart, for (7) years at her parents' home. At one point after a fight the 1st accused person told his brother, P. W.1 he did not want the deceased at his home. Death threats were constant. On 15/05/2010 the deceased went to the 1st accused's home to see the wife of his elder brother at Ekerenyo. After that her body was seen near Ekerenyo.
P.W.2 — Pacifica Gesare —the mother of the deceased, she related how two visitors, the 2" accused visited the deceased in the shamba, asking her to pay them a visit when she did she never came back alive. The 1st accused did not want the deceased at the home. He issued threats constantly.
PW3-Rudia Nyamboga —a Manga Primary School girl saw the two visitors come home. Took them to her auntie in the shamba. They stayed in the shamba for (3) hours. Auntie gave her phone number to them and that of her brother Charles Ombati.
PW4-Jackline Moraa Nyamongo,the daughter of the deceased. She testified that the 1st accused issued death threats to Charles Ombati, Pacifica Gesare and Hellen Kerubo Nyamongoto her.
PW5-Duke Arasa Nyamongois the son of the deceased together with the 1st accused. He testified that one day upon visiting his mother at the grandmother, their father, the 1st accused punished them so badly. He caned them and denied them money for food.
PWb- Dr. Harrison Onguticause of death was cutting of neck region extending to nervous system resulting in haemorrhage and injury to spinal cord.
PW7-No. 65609 Sgt. Anderson Kimathi,the investigating officer in this case. Using the phone numbers of the deceased, the 1st accused and the 2nd accused the investigation pointed to the two accused as they lured the deceased through phone communication to her death.
PW8-Chief Inspector James Tali, No.217859,recorded the confession of the 2nd accused in which he admitted being hired to kill the deceased. He was paid Kshs.32,000 as the first payment. At the time he was arrested he had not completed the payment. Exhibit -5.
Findings
The evidence in totality points to the two accused persons as the people who conspired, the first accused hiring a hit man, the second accused, to eliminate the deceased. P.W.8 — Exhibit 5, 2nd accused's confession is a testimony to his involvement to the offence of murder.
The prosecution has made out a prima facie case against the accused person.
Accordingly, I find that the two accused persons, David Ngasora Nyamongoand Thomas Aranga Nyandibi,have a case to answer.
Therefore I put them to their defence.
How do they work to proceed with their defence?
Dated and delivered at Nyamira this 8th day of April, 2016.
C.B. NAGILLAH
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Nyagwencha for 1 St accused person
Nyagwencha hold brief for Ondari for 2nd accused person Konga for the State
Mercy Court clerk