[2018] KEHC 4977 (KLR)
The High Court determined that it has jurisdiction to strike out a notice of appeal that was filed in its registry in relation to proceedings before it, especially where the notice was filed in the wrong forum. The court found that the notice of appeal filed on 23/07/2013 was incompetent as it should have been filed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4977 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: The DC Mbeere North District; Respondent: The DC Mbeere South District; Respondent: The DC Masinga District; Respondent: The DC Yatta District; Respondent: The DC Embu East District; Respondent: The DC Embu West District; Respondent: The DC Embu North District; Respondent: The Commissioner of Police; Appellant: Dangai Herbal Limited; Applicant: National Agency for the Campaign Against Drug Abuse (NACADA)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 1 August 2018
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 76 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs
- Judges
- FN Muchemi
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Jurisdiction of High Court, Striking Out Documents, Notice of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
The DC Mbeere North District
Respondent
The DC Mbeere South District
Respondent
The DC Masinga District
Respondent
The DC Yatta District
Respondent
The DC Embu East District
Respondent
The DC Embu West District
Respondent
The DC Embu North District
Respondent
The Commissioner of Police
Respondent
Dangai Herbal Limited
Appellant
National Agency for the Campaign Against Drug Abuse (NACADA)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to strike out a notice of appeal filed in the wrong court.
- 2 Whether the application to strike out the notice of appeal is merited.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that it has jurisdiction to strike out a notice of appeal that was filed in its registry in relation to proceedings before it, especially where the notice was filed in the wrong forum. The court found that the notice of appeal filed on 23/07/2013 was incompetent as it should have been filed in the Court of Appeal, not the High Court. The rules regarding time limits for striking out such notices are only applicable when the notice is filed in the correct court. Since the notice was filed in the wrong court, the time limitation argument does not apply. The court concluded that it is within its powers to strike out the incompetent notice of appeal and proceeded to...
Court Disposition
application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs
Orders
- The notice of appeal filed on 23/07/2013 is struck out as incompetent.
- Costs awarded to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment