[2021] KEHC 2469 (KLR)
The court held that while the Sentencing Policy Guidelines provide useful direction, they do not supersede the written law. Section 205 of the Penal Code prescribes life imprisonment for manslaughter, and the court retains discretion within that maximum. The court considered the mitigation advanced by counsel,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 2469 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Dennis Langat; Defendant: Kennedy Okuli
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Garissa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case Case3 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Both accused persons sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for manslaughter.
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Guidelines, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Dennis Langat
Defendant
Kennedy Okuli
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the offence of manslaughter under Section 205 of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether the Sentencing Policy Guidelines can justify a non-custodial sentence for manslaughter.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while the Sentencing Policy Guidelines provide useful direction, they do not supersede the written law. Section 205 of the Penal Code prescribes life imprisonment for manslaughter, and the court retains discretion within that maximum. The court considered the mitigation advanced by counsel, including references to proportionality and the impact of the offence, but found that the gravity of the offence—resulting in death—outweighed arguments for a non-custodial sentence. The court determined that a custodial sentence was warranted and proportionate to the harm caused, and accordingly sentenced both accused persons to 10 years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Both accused persons sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for manslaughter.
Orders
- Both Dennis Langat and Kennedy Okuli are sentenced to a jail term of 10 years each.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT GARISSA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2019
REPUBLIC……….……………………….…………………….PROSECUTION
VERSUS
DENNIS LANGAT…………………….………………………….1ST ACCUSED
KENNEDY OKULI………………………………………………2ND ACCUSED
SENTENCE
1. The court has considered the Judgement written by Kariuki J and the mitigation made by Mr. Onono counsel on record for the 1st and 2nd accused and the additional mitigation made by Mr. Kairu on behalf of the 2nd accused more particularly reference made to paragraph No. 7 – 19 of the Judiciary Guidelines on Sentencing.
2. The statute that remains applicable in our jurisdiction and prescribes for the sentence to be meted out in relation to the offence of manslaughter, which the accused persons were convicted of is the Penal Code and in particular Section 205 thereof which provides
“(205) Punishment of manslaughter
Any person who commits the felony of manslaughter is liable to imprisonment for life.”
3. The above section of the law allows the court to use discretion to the maximum limit of life imprisonment. No option for non-custodial sentence is prescribed.
4. Counsel Mr. Kairu relied heavily on the Sentencing Policy Guidelines on seeking for a non-custodial sentence for his client. It is clear that the said guidelines remain to be “guidelines” and cannot be a substitute for the written law.
5. Further paragraph 3. 1 of the said guidelines also states as follows;
“Proportionality; The sentence meted out must be proportionate to the offending behavior. The punishment must not be more or less than is merited in view of the gravity of the offence. Proportionality of the sentence to the offending behavior is weighed in view of the actual, foreseeable and intended impact of the offence as well as the responsibility of the offender.”
6. Having considered the circumstances of the case, the mitigating factors submitted by counsel at length on behalf of the accused persons it is noteworthy that the harm caused by the offence resulting in the death of the deceased is immeasurable to the family of the deceased and the society generally. The action of the accused persons caused a major loss, death. This must be weighed against other relevant factors that the court takes into account.
7. Weighing all relevant factors this court sentences both the accused person to a jail term of 10 years.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT GARISSA THIS 4th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021.
……………….………………
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE