[2021] KEHC 7910 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7910 (KLR)

The court held that it could not grant the final orders sought by the applicant at this interlocutory stage, as leave to commence judicial review proceedings had not yet been granted and the application before the court was not an appeal but a judicial review. However, to prevent the judicial review application from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7910 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Director of Immigration Services; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary for Interior and Co-ordination of National Government; Respondent: Attorney General; Applicant: Zarko Knezevic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Interim Application for Stay Pending Leave Determination
Outcome
interim orders granted in part; application for renewal of special pass declined at this stage
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Immigration Status, Special Pass Renewal, Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Immigration Status Special Pass Renewal Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Director of Immigration Services

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary for Interior and Co-ordination of National Government

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Zarko Knezevic

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Interim Application for Stay Pending Leave Determination

  1. 1 Whether the court can grant interim orders restraining removal of the applicant from Kenya pending determination of leave to commence judicial review proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a renewal of his special pass pending hearing and determination of the judicial review application.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has exhausted statutory remedies under section 40 of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it could not grant the final orders sought by the applicant at this interlocutory stage, as leave to commence judicial review proceedings had not yet been granted and the application before the court was not an appeal but a judicial review. However, to prevent the judicial review application from being rendered nugatory and to preserve the applicant's rights pending determination of leave, the court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to restrain the respondents from removing the applicant from Kenya. The court clarified that this order did not compel the respondents to renew or issue a special pass to the applicant. The court also directed service of the application...

Court Disposition

interim orders granted in part; application for renewal of special pass declined at this stage

Orders

  • The respondents are restrained from removing the ex parte applicant from Kenya pending hearing and determination of the Amended Chamber Summons or until further orders of the court.
  • For avoidance of doubt, the order does not compel the respondents to issue a special pass to the applicant.