[2020] KEHC 5356 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 5356 (KLR)

The court finds that the applicant's request for leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari raises serious issues that require inter partes hearing, particularly regarding whether the criminal proceedings are an abuse of process due to their alleged civil nature and whether the application is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 5356 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution; Applicant: Edward Samuel Ngugi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application 109 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Directions
Outcome
Application certified urgent and admitted for inter partes hearing; directions issued for further steps.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Abuse of Process, Time Limitation, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Criminal Law Judicial Review Certiorari Abuse of Process Time Limitation Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecution

Respondent

Edward Samuel Ngugi

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Directions

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari to quash criminal proceedings against the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the criminal proceedings are an abuse of process due to their civil nature.
  3. 3 Whether the application is time-barred under Order 53 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court finds that the applicant's request for leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari raises serious issues that require inter partes hearing, particularly regarding whether the criminal proceedings are an abuse of process due to their alleged civil nature and whether the application is time-barred under Order 53 Rule 2. The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence of his participation in the referenced civil suits or the relation of those judgments to the criminal proceedings. The court therefore certifies the application as urgent, directs the applicant to file supplementary affidavits with certified copies of relevant judgments and orders, and orders service on...

Court Disposition

Application certified urgent and admitted for inter partes hearing; directions issued for further steps.

Orders

  • The ex parte Applicant’s Chamber Summons application dated 21st May 2020 is certified as urgent and admitted for hearing on a priority basis.
  • The applicant shall file a supplementary affidavit annexing certified copies of relevant judgments and orders within thirty (30) days.