[2015] KEHC 6440 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 6440 (KLR)

The court found that its previous order directing the Ag. Inspector-General to apprehend and detain the TSC Secretary General for contempt had not been complied with, despite evidence of proper service. No explanation for non-compliance was provided by the relevant authorities or their advocates. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 6440 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Simon P. Kamau & 19 Others; Respondent: Teachers Service Commission; Respondent: Attorney-General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 18 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Enforcement of Contempt Orders
Outcome
Summons issued to Ag. Inspector-General to show cause for non-compliance with court orders.
Judges
JK Mulwa
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Orders Contempt of Court Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon P. Kamau & 19 Others

Applicant

Teachers Service Commission

Respondent

Attorney-General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Enforcement of Contempt Orders

  1. 1 Whether the Ag. Inspector-General of Police has complied with court orders to apprehend the TSC Secretary General for contempt of court.
  2. 2 Whether the court should issue further orders to compel compliance with its previous orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that its previous order directing the Ag. Inspector-General to apprehend and detain the TSC Secretary General for contempt had not been complied with, despite evidence of proper service. No explanation for non-compliance was provided by the relevant authorities or their advocates. The court reaffirmed the principle that court orders must be obeyed and, in the absence of any justification for non-compliance, determined that it was necessary to issue summons to the Ag. Inspector-General to personally appear and explain the failure to execute the court's orders. This action was taken to uphold the rule of law and the authority of the court.

Court Disposition

Summons issued to Ag. Inspector-General to show cause for non-compliance with court orders.

Orders

  • Summons to issue directed to the Ag. Inspector-General Mr. Samuel Arachi to attend court in person on 12th March 2015 at 9:00 a.m. to show cause why the orders of the court have not been obeyed or cannot be obeyed.
  • A copy of the orders issued on 20th February 2015 to be attached to the summons.