[2023] KEELC 19285 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 19285 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds to be granted leave to apply for judicial review orders against the Disciplinary Tribunal's decision of July 3, 2019. The court noted the significant lapse of time since the impugned decision but did not find this, at the leave stage, to be a bar...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 19285 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Disciplinary Tribunal; Defendant: Advocates Complaints Commission; Respondent: Wilson Mirangi Wacuka; Applicant: Peter Mathenge Gitonga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E012 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Stay Application
Outcome
partially allowed
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Leave to Apply, Certiorari, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Leave to Apply Certiorari Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Disciplinary Tribunal

Respondent

Advocates Complaints Commission

Defendant

Wilson Mirangi Wacuka

Respondent

Peter Mathenge Gitonga

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Stay Application

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to apply for judicial review orders to quash the Disciplinary Tribunal's decision of July 3, 2019.
  2. 2 Whether the grant of leave should operate as a stay of the Tribunal's decision and further proceedings pending determination of the substantive application.
  3. 3 Whether the timing of the application, given the lapse of four years since the impugned decision, affects the grant of leave.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds to be granted leave to apply for judicial review orders against the Disciplinary Tribunal's decision of July 3, 2019. The court noted the significant lapse of time since the impugned decision but did not find this, at the leave stage, to be a bar to granting leave. The court partially allowed the application by granting leave in terms of prayer 2, allowing the applicant to file the substantive motion, and issued directions for service and responses. The court did not expressly grant a stay of the Tribunal's decision or further proceedings at this stage, instead focusing on the procedural aspects of moving the matter...

Court Disposition

partially allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted in terms of prayer no 2 in the application dated June 23, 2023 for the filing of the Judicial Review Notice of Motion.
  • The substantive motion to be served alongside all suit papers within 21 days from the date of delivery of this ruling (by August 18, 2023).