[2013] KEHC 3844 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3844 (KLR)

The court found that the application for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition was unopposed, as the respondent failed to file any response despite being duly served. In the absence of opposition and upon consideration of the application, the court saw no reason to decline the orders sought. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 3844 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: District Commissioner – Kakamega Central; Applicant: Andrew Koroso Marwa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 43 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari and Prohibition
Outcome
Application allowed. Certiorari and prohibition orders granted as prayed. Costs awarded to ex-parte applicant.
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Prohibition Orders, Public Officer Actions
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Certiorari Prohibition Orders Public Officer Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

District Commissioner – Kakamega Central

Respondent

Andrew Koroso Marwa

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari and Prohibition

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders of certiorari and prohibition against the District Commissioner, Kakamega Central.
  2. 2 Whether the lack of opposition from the respondent affects the grant of judicial review orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition was unopposed, as the respondent failed to file any response despite being duly served. In the absence of opposition and upon consideration of the application, the court saw no reason to decline the orders sought. The court therefore granted the orders of certiorari and prohibition as requested in the application, and ordered the respondent to pay the costs of the ex-parte applicant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Certiorari and prohibition orders granted as prayed. Costs awarded to ex-parte applicant.

Orders

  • Certiorari order issued quashing the impugned administrative action of the District Commissioner, Kakamega Central.
  • Prohibition order issued restraining the District Commissioner, Kakamega Central, from further similar actions as specified in the application.