[2024] KEELC 13509 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 13509 (KLR)

The court found that the dispute at hand concerns boundaries of registered land, which, pursuant to Section 18(2) of the Land Registration Act, falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Land Registrar and not the Environment and Land Court. The court further noted that the parties had previously consented to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 13509 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: District Land Registrar, Kajiado; Respondent: District Surveyor, Kajiado; Applicant: Joseph Kiplangat Kilisio; Interested Party: National Land Commission; Interested Party: Kenya Rural Roads Authority; Interested Party: Clear Resources Limited; Interested Party: Wilson Oloyiende Ntayia; Interested Party: Edward Gitau Ntayia
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E010 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdiction
Outcome
suit struck out for want of jurisdiction and in contravention of consent order
Judges
MN Gicheru
Legal Topics
Boundary Disputes, Jurisdiction of Environment and Land Court, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Boundary Disputes Jurisdiction of Environment and Land Court Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

District Land Registrar, Kajiado

Respondent

District Surveyor, Kajiado

Respondent

Joseph Kiplangat Kilisio

Applicant

National Land Commission

Interested Party

Kenya Rural Roads Authority

Interested Party

Clear Resources Limited

Interested Party

Wilson Oloyiende Ntayia

Interested Party

Edward Gitau Ntayia

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to determine a boundary dispute relating to registered land.
  2. 2 Whether the suit is properly before the court in light of the consent order referring the matter to the Land Registrar.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has demonstrated a triable cause of action before the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute at hand concerns boundaries of registered land, which, pursuant to Section 18(2) of the Land Registration Act, falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Land Registrar and not the Environment and Land Court. The court further noted that the parties had previously consented to refer the matter to the Land Registrar for determination, and the applicant had failed to demonstrate any cause of action that would vest jurisdiction in the court. The applicant was given ample opportunity to show that the suit was properly before the court but failed to do so. Consequently, the court struck out the suit for want of jurisdiction and for being contrary to the...

Court Disposition

suit struck out for want of jurisdiction and in contravention of consent order

Orders

  • The suit is struck out with costs to the respondents and interested parties.
  • The matter remains referred to the Land Registrar for determination as per the consent order.