[2005] KEHC 397 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was the registered proprietor of the suit property, Nakuru Municipality Block 12/107, as evidenced by a valid Certificate of Lease. There was no evidence before the court of any valid cancellation of the applicant's title. The respondents, having been duly served, failed to appear...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 397 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: District Works Officer Ministry of Roads, Public Works and Housing, Nakuru; Respondent: Engineer C. M. Mukuva; Applicant: Mark Nganga Githiru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 345 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Orders of certiorari and prohibition granted. Costs to the applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Prohibition Orders, Public Officer Decisions, Eviction Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
District Works Officer Ministry of Roads, Public Works and Housing, Nakuru
Respondent
Engineer C. M. Mukuva
Respondent
Mark Nganga Githiru
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision of the Public Works Officer demanding rent or eviction from Nakuru Municipality Block 12/107 was lawful.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders of certiorari and prohibition against the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was the registered proprietor of the suit property, Nakuru Municipality Block 12/107, as evidenced by a valid Certificate of Lease. There was no evidence before the court of any valid cancellation of the applicant's title. The respondents, having been duly served, failed to appear or contest the application, and did not provide any justification for the decision to demand rent or threaten eviction. In the absence of any challenge or contrary evidence, the court held that the decision of the Public Works Officer was unlawful and amenable to judicial review. Accordingly, the court granted orders of certiorari to quash the impugned decision and prohibition...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Orders of certiorari and prohibition granted. Costs to the applicant.
Orders
- Order of certiorari issued to quash the decision of the Public Works Officer, Nakuru, Engineer C. M. Mukuva, contained in the letter dated 5th July, 2004, demanding rent or eviction in respect of Nakuru Municipality Block 12/107.
- Order of prohibition issued restraining the Public Works Officer, Nakuru, Engineer C. M. Mukuva, from enforcing the decision contained in the letter dated 5th July, 2004, demanding rent or eviction in respect of Nakuru Municipality Block 12/107.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
Misc Civ Appli 345 of 2004
REPUBLIC………………………………………...……….…………...APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE DISTRICT WORKS OFFICER MINISTRY OF ROADS, PUBLIC WORKS
AND HOUSING, NAKURU
ENGINEER C. M. MUKUVA…...………………….……………..RESPONDENTS
EX-PARTE .....................................................................MARK NGANGA GITHIRU
RULING
The application has been brought under Notice of Motion under Order LIII Rule 3 (1) and (2) Civil Procedure Rules, Section 8 (2), 9 (1) (b) of the Law Reform Act, Chapter 26, Laws of Kenya. The application seeks the following Orders:
(1)THATthis Honourable Court be pleased to issue an Order of Certiorari to bring before this Court and quash the decision of Public Works Officer, Nakuru, Engineer C. M. MUKUVA contained in a letter dated 5th July, 2004 to the subject herein being MARK NGANGA GITHIRU demanding for rent or in default eviction thereof in respect of NAKURU MUNICIPALITY BLOCK 12/107.
(2)THATthis Honourable Court be pleased to grant an order of prohibition prohibiting/restraining the Public Works Officer, Nakuru, Engineer C. M. MUKUVA from enforcing the decision contained in his letter dated 5th July, 2004 to the subject demanding for rent and/or in default eviction thereof in respect of NAKURU MUNICIPALITY BLOCK 12/107.
The application has been supported by the grounds on the surface of the same and the supporting affidavit of Mark Ng’ang’a Githiru. Though the Attorney-General was duly served on 8th December, 2004, he never turned up nor send any of his representative. Besides the above, the Attorney-General never filed any grounds of opposition nor replying affidavit. In effect, the Attorney-General has not challenged nor controverted the application on record. Apparently, the Certificate of Lease is in favour of the Applicant. This Court has not been shown any valid cancellation of the same by the Respondent.
In view of the above, I hereby grant Prayers No. 1 and 2. Costs to the Applicant in any event.
Those are the Orders of the Court.
MUGA APONDI
JUDGE
Ruling read, signed and delivered in open Court in the presence of Mr. Odhiambo.
MUGA APONDI
JUDGE
14TH JULY, 2005