[2010] KEHC 3344 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called five witnesses, has adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with the law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3344 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Domiano Muruu Mwithia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 53 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Domiano Muruu Mwithia
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called five witnesses, has adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with the law.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is informed of his right to address the court personally or through his advocate, to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make an unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
10 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
Criminal Case 53 of 2006
REPUBLIC …………………………………….. PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
DOMIANO MURUU MWITHIA ……..………. ACCUSED
RULING
The accused is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. Prosecution after calling 5 witnesses closed its case. I have considered the evidence adduced by prosecution and I find that prosecution has shown a prima facie case sufficient to put accused person to his defence. I now therefore inform the accused of his right to address the court either personally or by his advocate, to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make an unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence.
Dated and delivered at Meru this 19th day of March 2010.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE