[2020] KEHC 7023 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence presented by the prosecution was inconsistent, with three conflicting versions of the events leading to the death of the deceased. The contradictions in the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses created...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 7023 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Doreen Wianga Luganda
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 24 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether a Prima Facie Case Has Been Established at Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure, Acquittal, Constitutional Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Doreen Wianga Luganda
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether a Prima Facie Case Has Been Established at Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant her being put on her defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence on record, if uncontroverted, would justify a conviction for murder against the accused.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence presented by the prosecution was inconsistent, with three conflicting versions of the events leading to the death of the deceased. The contradictions in the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses created reasonable doubt as to the accused's culpability. Applying the standard set out in Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v. R, the court held that no reasonable tribunal, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence, could convict the accused on the basis of the prosecution's case if the accused chose to remain silent. Consequently, the accused was entitled to an acquittal under...
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused, Doreen Wianga Luganda, is acquitted of the offence of murder under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 24 OF 2017
REPUBLIC...........................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
DOREEN WIANGA LUGANDA...............................ACCUSED
RULING
1. Doreen Wianga Luganda is charged with an offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. The particulars of the offence are that on the 5th day of January 2017, at Burinda in Marachi West Location of Butula sub County within Busia County, unlawfully caused the death of James Nyabola.
3. The prosecution put forward three versions of how the accused is said to have killed the deceased. The first version was that the deceased grabbed the gun the accused had and a struggle over it ensued. It was during the struggle that the gun accidentally fired and shot both the accused and the deceased. This was in the evidence of A.P.C. Benard Wesonga (PW1) and A.P.C. Dominic Saruni (PW2) who were in company of the accused.
4. According to the evidence of these two officers, they were responding to a distress call to go and safe a life. Some two women had rushed to their post and requested for their intervention.
5. Upon their arrival at the scene which was about 150 meters away, they found a group of boda-boda riders who were arguing. When it was alleged that the deceased had hit a child, the deceased pounced on the accused and` there was a struggle before the two were injured by bullets that were accidentally fired.
6. The second version was by Patrick Onyango Osetero (PW4). According to this witness, after the deceased had knocked down a girl who was riding a bicycle, some three Aps went to arrest him but he resisted. This is when PW1 send the accused to go for guns. He said that she returned with two guns. The accused placed the gun on the ribs of the deceased and fired. When the officers were going away and on reaching near a borehole, the accused shot herself in the leg.
7. Godfrey Omondi Otieno (PW5) came with a third version. In his testimony he said that when the deceased resisted arrest, the accused was sent for guns and she returned with two. They started to push the deceased to the AP post. While they were doing so, many boda-boda riders went to the scene. The armed male officer shot in the air and a second gun went off and this is when he saw the deceased lying down. The female officer (the accused) placed her gun down and it was picked by the male officer. This witness gave a different version in his statement. He stated that he saw the accused shoot the deceased while in court he said as he was running away after a shot in the air, when he turned, he saw the deceased lying down.
8. What is a prima facie case? In the Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th Editionit is defined as follows:
Prima facie case. (1805) I. The establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption. 2. A party's production of enough evidence to allow the fact-trier to infer the fact at issue and rule in the party's favor.
9. The Court of appeal in the case of Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v. R [1957] E.A 332 at 334 and 335, defined prima facie case as follows:
It is may not be easy to define what is meant by a “prima facie case”, but at least it must mean one on which a reasonable tribunal, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence.
10. Article 50 (2) (i) of the Constitution of Kenya provides:
(2) Every accused person has the right to a fair trial, which includes the right—
(i) to remain silent, and not to testify during the proceedings;
In the instant case, if the accused opts to exercise her constitutional right hereinabove stated, I cannot enter a conviction based on the evidence on record. This therefore means that the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against her. I accordingly acquit her of the offence of murder under section 306 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
DELIVEREDandSIGNEDatBUSIAthis8thday of April,2020
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE