[2017] KEHC 7055 (KLR)
The court held that the right to bail pending trial is constitutional and should be granted unless compelling reasons are shown. In this case, the state did not oppose the application for bail, and the pre-bail report recommended the 2nd accused as suitable for release. The court found no compelling reasons to deny...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 7055 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Douglas Waweru Mwangi; Defendant: Samson Guchu Waithaka
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 16 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- application_allowed
- Judges
- LW Gitari
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Compelling Reasons, Witness Interference
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Douglas Waweru Mwangi
Defendant
Samson Guchu Waithaka
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the 2nd accused bail.
- 3 Whether the 2nd accused is likely to interfere with witnesses if released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the right to bail pending trial is constitutional and should be granted unless compelling reasons are shown. In this case, the state did not oppose the application for bail, and the pre-bail report recommended the 2nd accused as suitable for release. The court found no compelling reasons to deny bail, but imposed a condition that the accused must not interfere with witnesses, with the consequence of arrest and bond cancellation if breached.
Court Disposition
application_allowed
Orders
- The 2nd accused shall be released on bail pending trial.
- The 2nd accused is ordered not to interfere with any witness or any person intended to be a witness in the trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
CRIMINAL MURDER NO. 16 OF 2016
REPUBLIC………………………..……PROSECUTOR
-VERSUS-
DOUGLAS WAWERU MWANGI…….. 1ST ACCUSED
SAMSON GUCHU WAITHAKA….…..2ND ACCUSED
RULING
1. The 2nd accused Samson Guchu Waithaka brought an application by way of Notice of Motion under Article 49 (1) (h) and Article 2 of the Constitutionseeking an order that he be released on bond with surety pending hearing and determination of this case.
2. He based the application on the grounds that he has a constitutional right to bail pending trial, is presumed innocent until proven guilty, has pleaded not guilty to the charge and will abide by any conditions that the court may set.
3. According to the 2nd accused, there are no compelling reasons to deny him bail. He supported the application with an affidavit sworn on 24th November, 2016.
4. The state filed a replying affidavit sworn by Inspector Obadiah Musira contending that the accused person had threatened witnesses of dire consequences if they gave any information to the Police.
5. According to Inspector Musira the accused were likely to interfere with efforts to trace the relatives of the deceased.
6. At the time of hearing, the state informed the court that they did not oppose the application but agreed with defence that the 2nd accused should not interfere with witnesses.
7. I have considered the application. I find that bail pending trial is a constitutional right under Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution. The 2nd accused should enjoy the right unless there are compelling reasons. Since the state does not oppose the application, the 2nd accused is entitled to bail. I have considered the pre-bail report filed by the Probation Officer. It recommends that the 2nd accused is suitable for release on bail pending trial.
8. I order that the 2nd accused shall be released on bail pending trial. The 2nd accused is ordered not to interfere with any witness or any person intended to be a witness in the trial. In the event that he does not comply with this condition, Police will be at liberty to arrest him and present him in court for cancellation of his bond.
9. The 2nd accused be released on a bond of Ksh.1,000,000/= plus one like surety to be approved by the Deputy Registrar.
Dated and delivered at Kerugoya this 21st day of February 2017.
L. W. GITARI
JUDGE
Read out in open court, in the presence of Mr. Sitati for State, court assistant Naomi Murage and 1st and 2nd accused.
L. W. GITARI
JUDGE
21. 2.2017