[2025] KEHC 5147 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, through the evidence of four witnesses, had established sufficient facts to constitute a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. The evidence included the circumstances of the alleged fight between the accused and the deceased, as well as their relationship. Applying section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the principles from relevant case law, the court held that there was enough evidence on record that, if unchallenged, could sustain a conviction. Therefore, the accused was called upon to make his defence, and the matter was set down for defence hearing.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 5147 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ewoi Edan
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Lodwar
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2025
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E001 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to make his defence.
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Ewoi Edan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being put on his defence.
- 2 What constitutes a prima facie case at the close of the prosecution case under section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, through the evidence of four witnesses, had established sufficient facts to constitute a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. The evidence included the circumstances of the alleged fight between the accused and the deceased, as well as their relationship. Applying section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the principles from relevant case law, the court held that there was enough evidence on record that, if unchallenged, could sustain a conviction. Therefore, the accused was called upon to make his defence, and the matter was set down for defence hearing.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to make his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is called upon to make his defence.
- Defence hearing is scheduled for 2nd May, 2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment