[2020] KEHC 8700 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8700 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion under Section 137(J)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to retain the trial in the current court. The judge considered the submissions of all parties, who unanimously agreed that transferring the case would result in significant delay and wastage of judicial resources, as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8700 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Eddlied Mandi Jilani; Defendant: Makonde Ruwa Buni; Defendant: Ngaira Karisa Charo; Defendant: Katana Karisa Charo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 24 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Direction on Venue of Trial Under Section 137(j)(2) Cpc
Outcome
Trial to proceed in current court; counsel to be appointed for 3rd accused.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Trial Venue, Transfer of Proceedings, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Trial Venue Transfer of Proceedings Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Eddlied Mandi Jilani

Defendant

Makonde Ruwa Buni

Defendant

Ngaira Karisa Charo

Defendant

Katana Karisa Charo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Direction on Venue of Trial Under Section 137(j)(2) Cpc

  1. 1 Whether the trial should proceed in the current court or be transferred to another court under Section 137(J)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether changing the trial court would cause undue delay and defeat justice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion under Section 137(J)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to retain the trial in the current court. The judge considered the submissions of all parties, who unanimously agreed that transferring the case would result in significant delay and wastage of judicial resources, as substantial proceedings had already taken place. The court found that the interests of justice and the need for expediency outweighed any reason for transfer. Therefore, the trial would proceed in the current court, and the Deputy Registrar was directed to appoint counsel for the 3rd accused to ensure fair representation.

Court Disposition

Trial to proceed in current court; counsel to be appointed for 3rd accused.

Orders

  • The trial of this matter will proceed in this court.
  • The Deputy Registrar is directed to appoint counsel for the 3rd accused.