[2019] KEHC 8743 (KLR)
The court found that although eyewitness testimony strongly suggested the accused attacked the deceased with a panga, the prosecution failed to produce a post mortem report or call the doctor who conducted the post mortem as a witness. The investigating officer also did not testify. In the absence of this crucial...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 8743 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Edwin Kibiwot Cheruiyot
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 52 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- AM Githinji
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Post Mortem Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Edwin Kibiwot Cheruiyot
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being placed on his defence.
- 2 Whether the absence of a post mortem report and testimony from the doctor or investigating officer fatally undermined the prosecution's case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although eyewitness testimony strongly suggested the accused attacked the deceased with a panga, the prosecution failed to produce a post mortem report or call the doctor who conducted the post mortem as a witness. The investigating officer also did not testify. In the absence of this crucial evidence, the actual cause of death was not established beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution had not made out a prima facie case against the accused, as required by law, and therefore acquitted him under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused, Edwin Kibiwot Cheruiyot, is acquitted of the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused is set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 52 OF 2009
REPUBLIC.................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
EDWIN KIBIWOT CHERUIYOT...........................RESPONDENT
RULING
EDWIN KIBIWOT CHERUIYOT is charged with the offence of Murder, contrary to Section 203 as read with 204of the Penal Code.
The particulars of this offence are that on the 21st day of September, 2009 at Barageywet village in Nandi North district within the Rift Valley province, the accused murdered Eliud Kipruto Kibitok.
The prosecution case is that PW-3 in this case is the mother to the deceased one Eliud Kipruto Kibitok, and also to PW-4 and PW-5. On 21st September 2009 at around 8. 00 a.m PW-1 was in company of the deceased, PW-2 and one Paul Korir. PW-2 is the son of Paul Korir and they were at their home where they were constructing a house. There was a time when the deceased and one Kipkemboi left briefly and went towards the river where beer was being sold and returned to the scene after about 30 minutes. At lunch time Judith Korir served them with lunch under the shade of a tree. They ate it and continued to chat. The deceased had sat between PW-1 and PW-2. The accused appeared at the scene armed with a panga. Without uttering a word he attacked the deceased, cutting him with it from behind. Those present screamed, attracting other neighbours to the scene. The accused escaped, leaving the weapon of attack behind, blood stained. The chief called the police. The police went to the scene and collected the body. They took it to Kapsabet District Hospital mortuary. On 23rd September, 2009 PW-4 and PW-5 identified the body at Kapsabet district hospital for post mortem.
The prosecution, from the foregoing reached point, were not able to avail any other witness and closed their case on 4th December 2018. It is therefore upon this court to determine whether a prima facie case is established against the accused person, so as to warrant him be placed on his defence. The cause of death to a deceased person, in line with any other available evidence, is established beyond reasonable doubt by the reliable and admissible evidence of a post mortem report. In this case, though clear that postmortem was conducted on the body of the deceased on 23rd September 2009, the doctor who performed it was not called as a witness and nor was the investigating officer, during the entire period of 9 years of which the accused underwent trial. Though the evidence of PW-1, PW-2 and PW-3 strongly suggests the attack by the accused to the deceased by use of a panga led to his instant death, such is not ascertained in absence of a post mortem report as to the actual cause of his death. The prosecution have therefore failed to ascertain beyond reasonable doubt that it is the accused who killed the deceased. As such, a prima facie case is not established by the prosecution and the accused is accordingly acquitted of the offence of murder, contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code, under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He is hereby set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
S. M GITHINJI
JUDGE
DATED, SIGNEDandDELIVEREDatELDORETthis28thday of March 2019.
In the presence of:-
1. The accused
2. Ms. Mokua for state /prosecutor
3. Mr. Mwelem- Court Assistant