[2018] KEHC 3110 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 3110 (KLR)

The court found that, although the accused was a first offender and had presented mitigation, the nature and circumstances of the offence, including the accused's role in waylaying the deceased, warranted a custodial sentence. The court exercised its discretion following the setting aside of the mandatory death...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 3110 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Enock Okoth Koi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 10 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing After Conviction and Resentencing Following Constitutional Petition
Outcome
accused resentenced to 30 years' imprisonment, sentence to run from date of original death sentence
Judges
AC Mrima
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing, Death Penalty, Resentencing, Mitigation, Constitutional Petition
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Death Penalty Resentencing Mitigation Constitutional Petition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Enock Okoth Koi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Sentencing After Conviction and Resentencing Following Constitutional Petition

  1. 1 Whether the accused should be resentenced following the setting aside of the mandatory death penalty.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused given the circumstances of the case and mitigation presented.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, although the accused was a first offender and had presented mitigation, the nature and circumstances of the offence, including the accused's role in waylaying the deceased, warranted a custodial sentence. The court exercised its discretion following the setting aside of the mandatory death penalty and, after considering the Pre-Sentence Report and all relevant factors, determined that the accused was not fit for a non-custodial sentence. Accordingly, the accused was sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment, with the sentence to run from the date of the original death sentence.

Court Disposition

accused resentenced to 30 years' imprisonment, sentence to run from date of original death sentence

Orders

  • The accused is sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment.
  • The sentence shall be deemed to run from the date the accused was sentenced to suffer death.