[2015] KEHC 3807 (KLR)
The court held that the right to bail is constitutionally guaranteed for all criminal offences, including murder, unless compelling reasons are shown to deny it. The prosecution's arguments that the accused might abscond due to the gravity of the offence and might interfere with witnesses were not supported by any...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 3807 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Ephantus Karanja Wangari
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 16 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail granted to the accused pending trial.
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Murder Charge, Constitutional Rights, Compelling Reasons
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Ephantus Karanja Wangari
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be granted bail pending trial for a charge of murder.
- 2 Whether the prosecution has demonstrated compelling reasons to deny bail under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the right to bail is constitutionally guaranteed for all criminal offences, including murder, unless compelling reasons are shown to deny it. The prosecution's arguments that the accused might abscond due to the gravity of the offence and might interfere with witnesses were not supported by any evidence. The court found that mere speculation does not amount to compelling reasons. As no compelling reason was established, the accused was entitled to bail on reasonable conditions.
Court Disposition
Bail granted to the accused pending trial.
Orders
- The accused shall be admitted to bail upon his own cognizance in the sum of KShs 100,000 and one surety in like sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA T MURANG’A
CRIMINAL CASE NO 16 OF 2015
REPUBLIC……………………………………PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
EPHANTUS KARANJA WANGARI ….…………ACCUSED
R U L I N G
1. The Accused Ephantus Karanja Wangari is charged with murdercontrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. It is alleged in the information dated 08/04/2015 that on 2nd February 2015 at Gitambaa village in Ruiru within Kiambu County he murdered one Peter Karanja. On 30/04/2015 he pleaded not guilty to the charge. His trial is scheduled to start on 09/11/2015. He has in the meantime applied to be admitted to bail pending the trial.
2. The Republic has opposed his release on bail by a replying affidavit filed on 23/06/2015 sworn by one No 71620 CPC Anlet Kaloki. The only reasons advanced for opposing bail are that the Accused is likely to abscond his trial due to the gravity of the offence he faces, and that there is a possibility of interference with witnesses.
3. As for gravity of the offence, bail is now a constitutional right for all criminal offences and will be denied only for compelling reason. Conditions for such bail must be reasonable. For all these see Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
4. Regarding the possibility of interference with witnesses, no shred of evidence of that likelihood has been placed before the court; speculation is not evidence.
5. I find no compelling reason to deny the Accused bail. He shall be admitted to bail upon his own cognizance in the sum of KShs 100,000/00 and one surety in like sum. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AT MURANG’A THIS 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY 2015