[2018] KEHC 8033 (KLR)
The court found, after reviewing the evidence of eleven prosecution witnesses, that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against all three accused persons. The evidence on record was deemed sufficient to support the charge of murder as defined under Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8033 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ephantus Mugendi Muriuki; Defendant: Isaack Kariuki Njeru; Defendant: Samuel Njue Njeru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 20 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- case to answer found; accused to be put on their defence
- Judges
- FN Muchemi
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Ephantus Mugendi Muriuki
Defendant
Isaack Kariuki Njeru
Defendant
Samuel Njue Njeru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being put on their defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence on record is sufficient to support the charge of murder against the accused persons.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, after reviewing the evidence of eleven prosecution witnesses, that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against all three accused persons. The evidence on record was deemed sufficient to support the charge of murder as defined under Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. Consequently, the court ruled that the accused persons have a case to answer and should be put on their defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
case to answer found; accused to be put on their defence
Orders
- The three accused persons are found to have a case to answer.
- The accused are ordered to be put on their defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 20 OF 2012
REPUBLIC....................................................PROSECUTION
VERSUS
EPHANTUS MUGENDI MURIUKI.............1ST ACCUSED
ISAACK KARIUKI NJERU..........................2ND ACCUSED
SAMUEL NJUE NJERU................................3RD ACCUSED
R U L I N G
1. The prosecution in this case called eleven (1) witnesses. The three accused persons face a charge of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. A plea of not guilty was entered in respect of all the three accused persons.
2. I have carefully perused the evidence on record and find it sufficient to support the charge in respect of the three accused persons.
3. It is my finding that the three accused persons have a case to answer.
4. It is hereby so ordered that they be put on their defence.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018.
F. MUCHEMI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-