[2019] KEHC 9541 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had made reasonable efforts to secure witnesses, but was unable to proceed due to the unavailability and untraceability of key witnesses, most of whom were street families. The application for nolle prosequi was properly made by the DPP in accordance with Article 157(6) and (8)...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 9541 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Erick Mwangi Muriuki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 58 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Nolle Prosequi Application
- Outcome
- Application for nolle prosequi allowed; accused discharged.
- Judges
- FM Mutuku
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Nolle Prosequi, Termination of Proceedings, Prosecutorial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Erick Mwangi Muriuki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Nolle Prosequi Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Director of Public Prosecutions should be permitted to terminate criminal proceedings against the accused by entering a nolle prosequi.
- 2 Whether the court should discharge the accused upon the DPP's application for nolle prosequi.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had made reasonable efforts to secure witnesses, but was unable to proceed due to the unavailability and untraceability of key witnesses, most of whom were street families. The application for nolle prosequi was properly made by the DPP in accordance with Article 157(6) and (8) of the Constitution and Section 82(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. There was no opposition from the defence. The court, therefore, exercised its discretion to permit the termination of proceedings and ordered the discharge of the accused, noting that such discharge does not preclude future proceedings on the same facts should circumstances change.
Court Disposition
Application for nolle prosequi allowed; accused discharged.
Orders
- The Director of Public Prosecutions is permitted to terminate criminal proceedings against Erick Mwangi Muriuki.
- The murder charge against Erick Mwangi Muriuki is hereby terminated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 58 OF 2016
REPUBLIC...............................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
ERICK MWANGI MURIUKI........................................ACCUSED
RULING
Erick Mwangi Muriuki is charged with the murder of Isaac Mwaura contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The offence is alleged to have been committed on 2nd July 2016 at Muthurwa Market near the mosque within Nairobi County. The accused denied committing this offence.
This matter was allocated to me on 19th March 2018. From that time forward, it became apparent to the court that the prosecution was having difficulties in securing attendance witnesses. On 23rd October 2018 Margaret Mwihaki (PW1) testified. Her role in this case was to identify the body of her brother Isaac Mwaura. She was the only witness to have testified. On 18th February 2019, Mrs. Kinoti, Learned Prosecution Counsel, informed the court that the DPP intended to enter a NolleProsequiin the matter. She presented a document dated 13th February 2019 to that effect to the court. The document is signed by Deputy DPP Mr. Jacob Ondari on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions. She asked the court to allow the DPP to terminate criminal proceedings against the accused in this murder case. The application was not opposed by Mrs. Omungala, Learned counsel for the accused.
The authority to terminate criminal proceedings is exercised by the Director of Public Prosecution vide Article 157 (6) of the Constitution (2010). This authority, however, cannot be exercised without permission from the court as provided under Article 157 (8) of the Constitution. Another relevant section of the law is Section 82(1) Criminal Procedure Code which provides as follows:
In any criminal case and at any stage thereof before verdict or judgment, as the case may be, the Director of Public Prosecutions may enter a nolle prosequi, either by stating in court or by informing the court in writing that the Republic intends that the proceedings shall not continue, and thereupon the accused be at once discharged in respect of the charge for which the nolle prosqui is entered, and if he has been committed to prison shall be released, or if on bail his recognizances shall be discharged; but discharge of an accused person shall not operate as a bar to subsequent proceedings against him on account of the same facts.
The reasons for the termination of criminal proceedings, though not expounded at the time of making this application, it is apparent to this court that the reasons behind the move taken by the DPP have been captured in the court records. The prosecution has had a hard time securing witnesses to attend court and testify and the court record is clear as intimated by the Prosecution Counsel that the witnesses, who are said to be street families, cannot be traced.
I have considered the matter and I find no reason to decline the application. Consequently, I hereby permit the DPP to terminate criminal proceedings against the accused Erick Mwangi Muriuki. For the avoidance of doubt, the murder charge contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code is hereby terminated. I consequently discharge Erick Mwangi Muriuki forthwith. He is free to enjoy his freedom unless for any other lawful cause he is held in custody. Orders shall issue accordingly.
Delivered, dated and signed this 19th day of February 2019.
S. M. Mutuku
Judge