[2015] KEHC 649 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 649 (KLR)

The court found that since the State did not oppose the application for bail and confirmed there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail, the accused was entitled to be released on bail or bond. The court therefore granted bail on specified terms, in accordance with the constitutional right to bail.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 649 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Republic; Defendant: Everlyne Wanza Kilungya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 104 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Bail Application
Outcome
bail granted
Legal Topics
Bail Application, Compelling Reasons, Pretrial Release
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Application Compelling Reasons Pretrial Release

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Respondent

Everlyne Wanza Kilungya

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Bail Application

  1. 1 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail.
  2. 2 Whether the accused should be released on bail or bond pending trial.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the State did not oppose the application for bail and confirmed there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail, the accused was entitled to be released on bail or bond. The court therefore granted bail on specified terms, in accordance with the constitutional right to bail.

Court Disposition

bail granted

Orders

  • Accused may deposit cash bail in the sum of KShs.50,000 for her release.
  • Alternatively, accused may sign a bond of KShs.200,000 with one surety of like sum.