[2015] KEHC 1875 (KLR)
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter under a plea bargain, was provoked by the deceased who initiated the attack with a spear. However, the accused's retaliatory action was not justifiable as he could have avoided using similar force. The court considered the three years already...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 1875 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ezekiel Otachi Akeya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 64 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- accused convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to two years non-custodial sentence under probation supervision
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Bargain, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Provocation, Probation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Ezekiel Otachi Akeya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was guilty of manslaughter as per the plea bargain agreement.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence considering the circumstances of the offence and mitigation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter under a plea bargain, was provoked by the deceased who initiated the attack with a spear. However, the accused's retaliatory action was not justifiable as he could have avoided using similar force. The court considered the three years already spent in custody, the remorse shown, the support of the family and community, and the welfare of the accused's young children. The court determined that a non-custodial sentence of two years under probation supervision was appropriate, balancing the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
accused convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to two years non-custodial sentence under probation supervision
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to two years non-custodial sentence.
- The accused will be supervised by the Probation Officer of his area during this period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 64 OF 2012
REPUBLIC ………………...PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
EZEKIEL OTACHI AKEYA……ACCUSED
SENTENCE
The accused person herein EZEKIEL OTACHI AKEYA, was initially charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
By a plea bargain agreement entered into on the 16th July 2015 between the accused person and the state, the said charge was reduced to manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code.
The particulars of the charge were that on 13th April 2012 at Nyangusu Sub-location in Nyamache District within Kisii County in the Republic of Kenya unlawfully caused the death of DOUGLAS MOGUSU AKEYA.
The accused person pleaded guilty to the said charge and was consequently convicted on his own plea of guilty.
The facts leading to the commission of the offence pleaded to were that on 13th April 2012, the deceased picked a quarrel with his brother, the accused, over water that they were using to bake bricks. The deceased ran into the house and armed himself with a spear which he threw at the accused, and it missed him. The accused in retaliation picked up the same spear and threw it back at the deceased piercing him on his left upper side and injuring him fatally.
A post mortem report determined the cause of death as cardio-respiratory arrest due to internal haemorhage.
In mitigation, Mr. Bigogo, counsel for the accused submitted that the accused was remorseful over the death of his own brother and that it was the deceased who provoked the accused by attacking him with a spear. He stated that the accused was a family man with three young children who still needed his care and protection.
The court ordered for pre-sentence and victim impact report which was filed on 24th September 2015 which report states that the accused’s family and community at large had no objection to his being released back to the society so that he could take care of his young children who had been abandoned by his wife who left the matrimonial home following the accused’s arrest.
I have considered the circumstances under which the offence was committed. The deceased threw the first salvo at the accused who retaliated by returning the same weapon back to the deceased. Clearly, the deceased was felled by his own spear which he had intended to use to hurt and probably kill the accused. The accused’s actions were, however, not justifiable as he could have avoided the confrontation through other ways other than using the same brutal force that the deceased used on him. I note that the actions of the accused were ignited by his quest for revenge, due to the breakdown in family values and lack of respect for human life.
I am however certain that the three year stint that the accused has had in custody is adequate lesson to him to keep off violence and crime.
Accordingly, I sentence the accused person herein EZEKIEL OTACHI ATEYA to two (2) years non-custodial sentence. He will, during this period be supervised by the Probation Officer of his area.
It is so ordered.
Signed, Datedand Delivered on this 27th day of October, 2015
HON. W. A. OKWANY
JUDGE In the presence of:
Mr. Majale for the State
Mr. Bigogo for the Accused
Omuga: court clerk