[2020] KEHC 1246 (KLR)
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to deny the accused bail. The pre-bail report indicated the accused was of fixed abode, had family support, and was not a flight risk. The prosecution did not oppose bail and left the matter to the court's discretion. Accordingly, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 1246 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Defendant: Faith Cherotich
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bomet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 27 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail granted to the accused on specified terms.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Murder Charge, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Faith Cherotich
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny bail to the accused.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to deny the accused bail. The pre-bail report indicated the accused was of fixed abode, had family support, and was not a flight risk. The prosecution did not oppose bail and left the matter to the court's discretion. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion in favour of granting bail, subject to specified conditions, in line with the constitutional right to bail unless compelling reasons are shown.
Court Disposition
Bail granted to the accused on specified terms.
Orders
- The accused shall post cash bail of Kshs. 300,000 with one surety of similar amount.
- Alternatively, the accused shall execute a personal bond of Kshs. 500,000 and provide two sureties of Kshs. 500,000 each.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BOMET
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 27 OF 2019
REPUBLIC......................................................................DPP
VERSUS
FAITH CHEROTICH........................................ACCUSED
RULING ON BAIL
1. The Accused is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code Cap 63 Laws of Kenya. The particulars of the offence are that on the 9th day of December, 2019, at about Boito Market, Boito sub location, Konoin Sub County within Bomet County murdered Dominic Ogatchi Sosi.
2. The Accused took plea on 18th December, 2019 before Dulu J. When the matter came up before on 25th November, 2020, defence counsel made an oral application for the accused to be granted bail pending trial. While praying for reasonable bond terms, Counsel submitted that the accused was a resident of Bomet County and was not a flight risk. On his part, Mr Mureithi learned Principal Prosecution Counsel, submitted that the Prosecution were not opposed to the grant of bond and asked the court to rely on the pre bail probation report while exercising discretion to grant or not to grant bond.
3. The pre - bail report was filed on 3rd November 2020. It states that the Accused is aged 18 and has one child whose age is not stated. The report further states that the parents of the Accused were supportive of her being granted bond and were ready to stand surety. The report however has no victim impact statement for reason that the victims of the family of the deceased could not be traced.
4. Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution grants an accused person the right to bail bond pending trial unless there were compelling reasons. Such compelling reasons must be brought to the attention of the court by the State. In this case, the prosecution did not oppose the application but left the matter to the discretion of the court and only urged the court to consider the pre bail report.
5. Following the above, I am persuaded that there were no compelling reasons to deny the Accused bail. She is granted bail on the following conditions:-
i. She shall post cash bail of Kshs. 300,000/= with one surety of similar amount.
ii. As an alternative to 1 above, the accused shall execute a personal bond of Kshs 500,000/= and provide 2 sureties of Kshs. 500,000/= each.
iii. The Accused shall attend court whenever required and shall not impede the trial in any way.
6. Orders accordingly.
Ruling delivered, dated and signed this 3rd day of December, 2020.
...................................
R. LAGAT-KORIR
JUDGE
Ruling delivered in the presence of the Accused, Defence Counsel Mr. Cheruiyot holding brief for Mr Ngeno, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP, and Kiprotich (Court Assistant).