[2020] KEHC 3358 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3358 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had previously sought similar orders in an earlier judicial review application (JR. Miscellaneous Application No. 52 of 2019). Given the overlap, and to address whether the current application constitutes an abuse of process, the court declined to grant ex parte leave or interim...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 3358 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Firearms Licensing Board; Applicant: Steve Mbogo Ndwiga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E008 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons Seeking Leave and Interim Orders
Outcome
Application to be served and heard inter partes; no ex parte leave or interim orders granted at this stage.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Leave to Apply, Certiorari, Mandamus, Exhaustion of Remedies
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Leave to Apply Certiorari Mandamus Exhaustion of Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Firearms Licensing Board

Respondent

Steve Mbogo Ndwiga

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons Seeking Leave and Interim Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to institute judicial review proceedings against the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be exempted from exhausting internal remedies under the Firearms Act before seeking judicial review.
  3. 3 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of the court process due to previous similar proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had previously sought similar orders in an earlier judicial review application (JR. Miscellaneous Application No. 52 of 2019). Given the overlap, and to address whether the current application constitutes an abuse of process, the court declined to grant ex parte leave or interim orders. Instead, the court directed that the application be served on the respondent and heard inter partes, so that all relevant issues, including the propriety of the application and the question of exhaustion of remedies, could be fully canvassed. The court also issued directions for electronic filing and service in light of COVID-19 protocols.

Court Disposition

Application to be served and heard inter partes; no ex parte leave or interim orders granted at this stage.

Orders

  • Applicant to serve the respondent with the application, submissions, this ruling, and hearing notice within 14 days.
  • Respondent to file responses and submissions within 14 days of service.