[2017] KEHC 6091 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called eight witnesses and presented its evidence, had established a prima facie case against the accused sufficient to require her to be put on her defence. The court emphasized that at this stage, it is not required to determine whether the prosecution has proved its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 6091 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Florence Wambui Nguru alias Ndunge wa Kochi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 47 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused put on her defence.
- Judges
- J Wakiaga
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Florence Wambui Nguru alias Ndunge wa Kochi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to require her to be put on her defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called eight witnesses and presented its evidence, had established a prima facie case against the accused sufficient to require her to be put on her defence. The court emphasized that at this stage, it is not required to determine whether the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, but only whether there is sufficient evidence to call for an explanation from the accused. The court relied on the principle that a ruling that there is a case to answer is justified even in borderline cases where the evidence, though not conclusive, might be sufficient to sustain a conviction upon full consideration. Accordingly, the accused was put...
Court Disposition
Accused put on her defence.
Orders
- The accused is put on her defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused is advised of her rights under Article 50(1)(k) and (l) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 47 OF 2014
REPUBLIC...................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
FLORENCE WAMBUI NGURU ALIAS
NDUNGE WA KOCHI…….ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused FLORENCE WAMBUI NGURU alias NDUNGE WA KOCHI is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code the particulars of which were that on 24/4/2014 at Mathare Area 3C in Starehe District within Nairobi County murdered DAVID MASESI MBUVI.
2. She pleaded not guilty and to prove its case the prosecution called a total of Eight (8) witnesses and when called upon to make submissions as to whether the prosecution had established a case to enable the court place the accused on her defence, the same through her advocate on record opted to make no submission and left it to the court to decide based upon the evidence on record.
3. At this stage, the issue is not whether or not the prosecution has established a case against the accused person beyond reasonable doubt but whether a case has been made to justify calling upon the accused person to offer an explanation as was stated in the case of REPUBLIC v JAGJIVAN M. PATEL & Others (1) TLR as follows:-
“All the court has to decide at the close of the evidence in support of the charge is whether a case is made out against the accused just sufficiently to require him to make a defence, it may be a strong case or a weak case. The court is not required at this stage to apply its mind in deciding finally whether the evidence is worthy of credit or whether if believed it is weighty enough to prove the case conclusively beyond reasonable doubt. A ruling that there is a case to answer would be justified in my opinion in a border line case where the court, though not satisfied as to the conclusiveness of the prosecution evidence, is yet of the opinion that the case made out is one which on full consideration might possibly be thought sufficient to sustain a conviction.”
4. From the evidence tendered before the court and without saying much on the same at this stage I am satisfied and find that the prosecution has proved a prima facie case against the accused person sufficient enough to enable me put the same, which I hereby do, on her defence.
5. The accused is therefore advised on her rights under Article 50(1) (k) and (l) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and Section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at Nairobi this 10th day of April, 2017.
…………………………
J. WAKIAGA
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Mrs. Kinoti for the State
Mr. Shimaku for the Accused
Accused present
Tabitha - court clerk