[2019] KEHC 7959 (KLR)
Although the law prescribes the death sentence for murder, the court considered the mitigation advanced on behalf of the accused, including their youth, remorse, and time spent in custody. Despite the negative pre-sentence reports and the brutality of the offence, the court exercised discretion to impose a life...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7959 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Francis Kinyua Abdi alias Rasta
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 53 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused persons sentenced to life imprisonment.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Repeat Offender, First Offender, Life Imprisonment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Francis Kinyua Abdi alias Rasta
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused persons convicted of murder given their respective offender status and mitigation?
- 2 How should the court weigh the negative pre-sentence reports and the victim's sentiments against the mitigation presented?
Ratio Decidendi
Although the law prescribes the death sentence for murder, the court considered the mitigation advanced on behalf of the accused, including their youth, remorse, and time spent in custody. Despite the negative pre-sentence reports and the brutality of the offence, the court exercised discretion to impose a life sentence instead of the death penalty, finding that the accused should be separated from society but that mitigation warranted a lesser sentence than death.
Court Disposition
Accused persons sentenced to life imprisonment.
Orders
- Each accused is sentenced to life imprisonment.
- Right of appeal within 14 days explained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 53 OF 2013
REPUBLIC....................................................................................DPP
VERSUS
FRANCIS KINYUA ABDI ALIAS RASTA....................ACCUSED
SENTENCING
1. I have considered the mitigation on behalf of the accused. The 1st accused is a repeat offender while the 2nd accused is a first offender. They are both young men with a bright future. They are remorseful and have been in custody since 2013.
2. However, the Pre-sentence reports are very negative. The victim’s sentiments are considered. The accused attacked and patched the deceased in the most brutal vicious and barbaric manner. They are best separated from society. A death sentence is the one decreed by law. But for their mitigation, I sentence them to life imprisonment.
Right of Appeal 14 days explained.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE
02/05/19