[2016] KEHC 1302 (KLR)
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to deny the accused bail pending trial. The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and there were no allegations or evidence that he would interfere with witnesses or abscond. The court emphasized that bail is a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 1302 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Francis Mugetha Mwangi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 20 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- bail granted
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Murder Charge, Constitutional Rights, Compelling Reasons for Bail
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Francis Mugetha Mwangi
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial for a charge of murder.
- 2 Whether there exist compelling reasons to deny the accused bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to deny the accused bail pending trial. The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and there were no allegations or evidence that he would interfere with witnesses or abscond. The court emphasized that bail is a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and that any conditions imposed must be reasonable. Given the absence of any objection or compelling reason from the prosecution, the court ordered the release of the accused on his own cognizance with a specified bond and surety.
Court Disposition
bail granted
Orders
- The accused shall be released upon his own cognizance in the sum of KShs 500,000 and one surety in like sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MURANG’A
CRIMINAL CASE NO 20 OF 2014
REPUBLIC.................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
FRANCIS MUGETHA MWANGI.......................ACCUSED
R U L I N G
1. The Accused in this case, Francis Mugetha Mwangi, is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. It is alleged in the information dated 04/08/2014 that on 01/08/2014 at Kasororo Village, Muchugucha Sub-Location, Mbiri Location within Murang’a County, he murdered Joyce Wairimu Njuguna.
2. The Accused’s plea was taken on 16/09/2014. His trial is yet to commence. He has applied to be admitted to bail in the meantime (notice of motion dated 08/09/2015). The Republic has not filed any papers in response to the application. Learned prosecution counsel, Mr. Njeru, informed the court at the hearing of the application on 26/04/2016 that he sought instructions in regard thereto from the investigating officer of the case vide a letter dated 02/12/2015, and that he had not received any instructions one way or the other. The record of the court also indicates that on 27/10/2015 when the case came up for hearing neither the investigating officer nor any witness was in court; learned prosecution counsel, Miss Keya, informed the court that she had instructed the investigating officer by a letter dated 04/05/2015 to bond witnesses for 27/10/2015 and to be present in court himself.
3. Bail pending trial is now a constitutional right for all criminal offences that will be denied only for compelling reason; and any condition for such bail that the court may impose must be reasonable. See Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
4. I have perused the witness statements and other documents supplied to the accused and to the court by the prosecution, and have noted the circumstances of the alleged offence. The Deceased was the wife of the Accused. At least one of the witnesses for the prosecution is a daughter of the Accused and the Deceased, now aged about 14 years or so. Other witnesses include close relatives of the Deceased and neighbours of the couple. But I hasten to add that there are no allegations that the Accused might interfere with witnesses. I also remind myself that he is innocent of the charge unless and until proven guilty.
5. In the circumstances I find no compelling reason to deny the Accused bail. He shall be released upon his own cognizance in the sum of KShs 500,000/00 and one surety in like sum. It is so ordered.
DATED AND SIGNED AT MURANG’A ON THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2016
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT MURANG’A THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2016