[2011] KEHC 1780 (KLR)
The court, upon re-evaluating the prosecution's evidence, found that a prima facie case had been established against the accused. This finding obliges the accused to be put on his defence, as required by Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The accused is reminded of his rights at this stage: to give...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 1780 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Francis Ndungu Githui
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 31 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case After Prosecution Evidence
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make his defence.
- Judges
- MJA Emukule
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Rights of Accused, Criminal Procedure, Section 306 Criminal Procedure Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Francis Ndungu Githui
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case After Prosecution Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, upon re-evaluating the prosecution's evidence, found that a prima facie case had been established against the accused. This finding obliges the accused to be put on his defence, as required by Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The accused is reminded of his rights at this stage: to give evidence on oath and call witnesses, to make an unsworn statement, or to remain silent. The court's decision is based on the sufficiency of the prosecution's evidence to meet the threshold for a case to answer, not on a determination of guilt.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is called upon to indicate, through his Advocate, which of the rights under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code he will exercise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 31 OF 2006
REPUBLIC…………………………………….……………………..…………………….PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
FRANCIS NDUNGU GITHUI…………………………………............…………………………..ACCUSED
RULING
Having re-evaluated the evidence of the prosecution, I am satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused.
The accused is reminded of his rights under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code,(Cap. 75, Laws of Kenya) to -
(1)give evidence on oath and to call witnesses to testify on his behalf, and be subjected to cross-examination by the prosecution counsel, or
(2) to make an unsworn statement, and not be subjected to cross-examination, or
(3) to remain silent.
The accused is called upon to indicate through his Advocate which of these rights he will exercise.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nakuru this 10th day of June 2011
M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE
JUDGE