[2016] KEHC 4032 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant is entitled to bail as a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, and that the State had not advanced any compelling reasons to deny bail. The court considered the probation report and the State's position, noting the absence of any evidence or argument that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 4032 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Fredrick Muriuki Gikunju; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 13 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Murder Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- application for bail allowed
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Compelling Reasons, Presumption of Innocence, Constitutional Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fredrick Muriuki Gikunju
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Murder Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the applicant bail.
- 3 What conditions, if any, should be imposed if bail is granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant is entitled to bail as a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, and that the State had not advanced any compelling reasons to deny bail. The court considered the probation report and the State's position, noting the absence of any evidence or argument that would justify denying the applicant his right to bail. Accordingly, the court allowed the application for bail, setting the terms at Kshs. 1 million with one surety of a similar amount, and imposed conditions to ensure the applicant does not interfere with witnesses and attends court as required.
Court Disposition
application for bail allowed
Orders
- The accused may be released on a bond of Kshs. 1,000,000 with one surety of similar amount.
- The accused is directed to completely stay away from the witnesses in this case and not to indirectly or directly try to contact them in any way.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
MURDER CASE NO. 13 OF 2016
REPUBLIC…………………………………………….….PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
FREDRICK MURIUKI GIKUNJU………………………….…APPELLANT
RULING
1. FREDRICK MURIUKI GIKUNJU is accused of causing the death of Phyllis Nyaguthii Karimi, contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. He denied the offence and the case is pending for trial. He has now moved this Court through a Notice of Motion dated 21st July, 2016 for bond/bail pending trial on the ground that he is entitled to his constitutional rights under Article 49 (1) and 50 of the Constitution which he has invoked in this application.
2. The other grounds for the application are as follows:-
(a) That he is willing to abide by any condition imposed by this Hon. Court and to attend court whenever he is required to do so.
(b) That there are no compelling reasons to deny him bond.
(c) That he has a fixed abode and not likely to abscond ifreleased on bond.
The application is supported by the affidavit by the applicant sworn on 21st July, 2016.
3. At the hearing of this application, the State through Mr. Omayo, learned counsel from the Director of Public Prosecutions informed this court that he was not opposed to the application owing to the probation report and the instructions he had received from the investigating officer in this case.
4. A right to bail/bond is a constitutional right to an accused person enshrined in the Constitution of Kenya 2010. Under the provisions of Article 49 (i) (h) that right can only be denied if there are compelling reasons. This is based on the right to a presumption of innocence that an accused person also enjoys under Article 50 of the Constitution.
5. I have looked at the probation report and the response by the State concerning this application. No compelling reasons have been advanced to deny bond/bail to the applicant herein and I find none. Consequently I allow the application dated 21st July, 2016. The accused herein may be released on a bond of Kshs. 1 Million (One Million Kenya Shillings) with one surety of similar amount. If released, the accused is directed to completely stay away from the witnesses in this case and not to indirectly or directly try to contact them in any way. He shall also attend court whenever required to do so and in this respect the accused is required to attend court on 6th December, 2016 for mention for purposes of taking a date in this case for trial.
Dated and delivered at Kerugoya this 28th day of July, 2016.
R. K. LIMO
JUDGE
28. 7.2016
Before Hon. Justice R. Limo J.,
State Counsel Sitati
Court Assistant Willy Mwangi
Accused present
Interpretation English – Kikuyu
Macharia holding brief for Ombachi for applicant.
Sitati for State present
COURT: Ruling signed, dated and delivered in the open court in the presence of Macharia for the applicant and sitati for the State.
R. K. LIMO
JUDGE
28. 7.2016