[2012] KEHC 3450 (KLR)
The court held that the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine a dispute involving title to land registered under the Registered Land Act. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act limits the tribunal's jurisdiction to matters of boundary, occupation,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 3450 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: Interested Party
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 49 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Tribunals, Registered Land Act, Certiorari, Quashing of Tribunal Awards
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Interested Party
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine disputes relating to land registered under the Registered Land Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption of the tribunal's award by the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court was valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine a dispute involving title to land registered under the Registered Land Act. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act limits the tribunal's jurisdiction to matters of boundary, occupation, or trespass, and does not extend to ownership or title of registered land. Section 159 of the Registered Land Act vests jurisdiction over such disputes exclusively in the High Court and Resident Magistrates Court. Consequently, the tribunal's award and its adoption by the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court were nullities. The court allowed the application for certiorari,...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The award of the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal as adopted by the Busia Court is called into the High Court and quashed.
- The costs of the suit are to be paid by the Interested Party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BUSIA
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION 49 OF 2002
REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………………………….APPLICANT
VERSUS
FUNYULA LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL …….........……………………………RESPONDENT
J U D G E M E N T
The exparte applicant in his Amended Notice of motion dated 7th June 2004 seeks for an order of certiorari to call into the High Court and quash the order made by the Senior Resident Magistrate Busia on 27/03/02 adopting the ward of Funyula Land Dispute Tribunal as the judgement of the court. The statement in support of the motion contains the facts and grounds in support of the application. The applicants main ground is that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute which relates to land registered under the Registered Land Act. The tribunal gave an order that the suit land title should go to the Interested party.
The interested party supports the decision of the tribunal as set out in its pleadings and submissions.
The jurisdiction of the tribunal is stipulated under section 3 (1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The tribunal has power to hear disputes relating to:
a)The division of, or the determination of boundaries to land
including land held in common;
b)a claim to occupy or work land or;
c)trespass to land
The proceedings before the tribunal are very clear that the Interested party was claiming title to Land parcel number Samia/Nambuku-Lugala/501 which was registered in the name of the exparte applicant. His kind of dispute is not included in Section 3 (1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the matter and to order that the title passes from the exparte applicant to the Interested party. It is only the courts of law which have jurisdiction to hear any dispute relating to land registered under the Registered Land Act cap 300. The certified copy of register confirms the registration of the land under the Act. Section 159 of the Act confers jurisdiction to hear land disputes on registered land to the High Court and to the Resident Magistrates court. It is the pecuniary value of the land which determines to which court the dispute shall be heard.
The Funyula Land Disputes tribunals award was made without jurisdiction thus rendering it null and void for all intents and purposes. The award could not be validated by its adoption as judgement by the Busia Senior Resident Magistrate. Such as endorsement by the court was a futile exercise. I rely on Civil Appeal no.256 of 2002 Kisumu where the Court of Appeal in a case with similar acts held that the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
The application dated 07/06/04 is hereby allowed. The award of the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal as adopted by the Busia Court is hereby called into this court and quashed accordingly. The costs of the suit to be paid by the Interested Party.
F.N. MUCHEMI
Judgement dated and delivered on the 28th day of May 2012 in the presence of Manwari Advocate.
L. KIMARU
J U D G E