[2013] KEHC 1531 (KLR)
The court found that the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by making an award that effectively ordered the cancellation of titles to registered land. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act limited the Tribunal's powers to matters concerning the division, determination of boundaries,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1531 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal; Applicant: Francis Anyiga Ligono; Interested Party: Vincent Wandera Ogai
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review 2 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Tribunal award and adoption quashed. Costs to applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Registered Land, Certiorari, Quashing of Awards
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Francis Anyiga Ligono
Applicant
Vincent Wandera Ogai
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to order cancellation of title to registered land.
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's award was null and void for exceeding its statutory powers.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by making an award that effectively ordered the cancellation of titles to registered land. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act limited the Tribunal's powers to matters concerning the division, determination of boundaries, occupation, or trespass to land, and did not extend to disputes over ownership or title of registered land. As such, the Tribunal's award and its adoption by the court were made without jurisdiction and are therefore null and void. The court granted the order of certiorari as prayed, quashing the Tribunal's award and the subsequent adoption, and ordered the Interested Party to...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Tribunal award and adoption quashed. Costs to applicant.
Orders
- The decision of the Funyula Land Disputes Tribunal in relation to Land parcel Samia/Wakhungu-Odiado/1484 and 1485 adopted in Busia PMC Land case no 3 of 2005 on 12th October 2006 is quashed.
- The Interested Party shall pay the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA
JUDICIAL REVIEW NO 2 OF 2013
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL ACT
(REPEALED)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT NO 3 OF 2012
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY FRANCIS ANYIGA LIGONO FOR AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC…………………………..……………………..APPLICANT
VERSUS
FUNYULA LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL……………..RESPONDENT
AND
VINCENT WANDERA OGAI……….……………INTERESTED PARTY
EX-PARTE…………………………………FRANCIS ANYIGA LIGONO
JUDGMENT
The Exparte Applicant, Francis Anyiga Ligono, through Ms. Obwoge Onsongo and Company advocates, filed the notice of motion dated 17/5/2013 for orders of certiorari to call into this Court and quash the award made by Funyula Land Dispute Tribunal and adopted in Busia PMC Land case no. 3 of 2005 on 12/10/2006 and costs. The main ground of the application is that the Tribunal acted beyond its powers by ordering the cancellation of title to registered land and therefore its orders were a nullity. The Interested Party, Vincent Wandera Ogai, opposed the application and filed a replying affidavit sworn on 29th July 2013, asking that the application be dismissed with costs.
When the matter came up for hearing on 26/9/2003, Mr. Onsongo Advocate for the Exparte Applicant and the Interested Party made their submissions. The court has carefully considered the contents of the pleadings, affidavits and submissions made by the parties and find as follows;
That from the copy of the Tribunal proceedings in case no. 11 of 2004, it is quite clear that the claim that has been filed by the Interested Party was for a portion of 0. 4HA of land from Samia/Wakhungu – Odiado/1485 and parcel Samia/Wakhungu – Odiado/1484. The Tribunal after hearing the parties concerned and their witnesses granted the Interested Party 4 acres of land. It also ordered that the Exparte Applicant should retain 1 acre and that the surveyors be called upon to do the sub-division.
That the award was clearly a matter that was beyond the powers granted to the Tribunal under section 3(1) of the Land Dispute Tribunal Act (now repealed) which limited the Tribunal powers to only disputes to do with “division of, or the determination of boundaries to land, including land held in common; a claim to occupy or work land, or trespassed land”.
That as shown above, the award of the Tribunal would result to the cancellations of the titles to the registered land while the Tribunal did not have powers to deal with issues or disputes relating to ownership of registered land under the Registered Land Act chapter 300 of the Laws of Kenya (now repealed).
That from the findings above, the decision of the Funyula Land Dispute Tribunal in relation to Land parcel Samia/Wakhungu-Odiado/1484 and 1485 adopted in Busia PMC Land case no 3 of 2005 on 12th October 2006, was without jurisdiction and therefore null and void. The same is therefore called into this court and quashed as prayed for under prayer (a) of the notice of motion dated 17/5/2013. The interested party will meet the costs of this application.
It is so ordered.
S.M KIBUNJA JUDGE
Dated, Delivered and Signed in Busia on this 9TH day of OCTOBER, 2013.
In the presence of;