[2012] KEHC 5676 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5676 (KLR)

The court found that the Gatanga Land Disputes Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain and determine disputes relating to ownership of registered land, as such jurisdiction is not conferred by Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The tribunal’s award, having been made without jurisdiction, was null and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 5676 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Gatanga Lands Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: Chief Magistrate’s Court Thika; Interested Party: Mbugua Kamau Gatiba; Applicant: Joseph Ngugi Kagutha
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 22 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed. Orders of certiorari and prohibition granted. Each party to bear its own costs.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Judicial Review, Registered Land Disputes, Certiorari and Prohibition
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Tribunals Judicial Review Registered Land Disputes Certiorari and Prohibition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Gatanga Lands Disputes Tribunal

Respondent

Chief Magistrate’s Court Thika

Respondent

Mbugua Kamau Gatiba

Interested Party

Joseph Ngugi Kagutha

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Gatanga Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine ownership of registered land.
  2. 2 Whether the award and proceedings of the Tribunal and the decree of the Chief Magistrate’s Court were null and void for want of jurisdiction.
  3. 3 Whether orders of certiorari and prohibition should issue to quash the tribunal's award and prohibit the District Land Registrar from acting on the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Gatanga Land Disputes Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain and determine disputes relating to ownership of registered land, as such jurisdiction is not conferred by Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The tribunal’s award, having been made without jurisdiction, was null and void ab initio. Consequently, the Chief Magistrate’s Court erred in adopting the tribunal’s award as a judgment and issuing a decree based on it. The decree and all consequential orders were therefore also nullities in law. The court concluded that the applicant had demonstrated entitlement to the reliefs sought, and accordingly granted orders of certiorari to quash the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Orders of certiorari and prohibition granted. Each party to bear its own costs.

Orders

  • An order of certiorari is issued to quash the entire proceedings and award made by the Gatanga Land Disputes Tribunal in Case No.LDT/08/20/2010/06 as well as the decree issued by the Thika Chief Magistrate’s Court in D.O. Case No.90 of 2010 and all its consequential orders.
  • An order of prohibition is issued prohibiting the District Land Registrar Thika or officers working under him from acting on the decree issued by the Thika Chief Magistrate’s Court in D.O. Case No.90 of 2010 in respect of Land Ref. No. LOC.16/NDUNYU-CHEGE/212.