[2019] KEHC 6155 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony and medical reports, established that the accused was the only person present with the deceased at the time of the fatal assault. The postmortem confirmed death by severe head injury due to assault. The court held that, based on the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 6155 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Geoffrey Mandela Lukulu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 16 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution's Case
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
- Judges
- CM Njagi
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure, Evidence Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Geoffrey Mandela Lukulu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence presented links the accused to the death of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony and medical reports, established that the accused was the only person present with the deceased at the time of the fatal assault. The postmortem confirmed death by severe head injury due to assault. The court held that, based on the totality of the evidence, a prima facie case had been established against the accused, sufficient to require him to be put on his defence. The legal standard for a prima facie case, as articulated in Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v Republic, was met, as a reasonable tribunal could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer.
- The accused is placed on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 16 OF 2014
REPUBLIC............................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
GEOFFREY MANDELA LUKULU...........................................ACCUSED
R U L I N G
The accused is charged with murder contrary to Section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that on the 23rd March, 2014 at Sichelechele Village, Makhokho Sub-Location, Uguhu location in Kakamega South District within Kakamega County murdered Benedict Likulu Lituro (herein referred as the deceased).
The prosecution case is that the deceased was the father to the accused. That on the evening of the material day the deceased and his wife PW2 were at home. PW2 was unwell and was resting outside her house. The deceased was inside their house. He was drunk. The accused returned back at 7. 30 p.m. He was also drunk. He found his mother PW1 outside the house. His mother told him to warm his supper inside the house. The accused entered into the house. The deceased started to abuse him. The abuses continued for some time. Later PW2 heard a shout from the house. She then heard things falling from the house. She went into the house to check what was going on. She met with the accused coming out of the kitchen. She found her husband lying on the floor. He was bleeding from the mouth and nostrils. She reported to her brother-in-law but they did not get a vehicle for ferrying the deceased to hospital.
A neighbour Benard Andali PW2, received the report at 4 a.m. He visited the deceased at his home. He was not talking. He reported to the village elder PW3. They looked for a vehicle. The deceased was taken to Kakamega County Referral Hospital. He was admitted. He died on the same day at 3 p.m. A report was made at Malaika Police Station. The accused was arrested by members of the public and taken to Ikolomani AP Camp. A club was recovered. APC Kemboi PW5 escorted the accused to Malaika Police Station. PC Maingi PW4 visited the scene and investigated the case. He received the club from administration police officers from Malaika Administration Police Post.
On 25/3/14 a postmortem was conducted on the body of the deceased by a Dr. Malangachi of Kakamega County Referral Hospital. The doctor found the body with a stitch wound on the left orbital region that was covered with a bandage and multiple skull bone fractures. There was bleeding in the head. The doctor formed the opinion that the cause of death was due to severe head injury as a result of assault. PC Maingi charged the accused with the offence. During the hearing he produced the club as exhibit, P.Ex.1. Dr. Kibisu PW6 produced the post mortem report on behalf of Dr. Malangachi as exhibit, P.Ex.2.
At the close of the case for the prosecution the advocate for the accused, Mr. Ondieki, did not make any submissions. The court is at this stage required to determine on whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused.
A prima facie case, it has been held, means -
“one on which a reasonable tribunal properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence- See Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt – Vs – Republic ( 1957) EA332.
The doctor’s report indicated that the deceased died due to severe head injury as a result of assault. The accused’s mother PW1 says that the accused is the only person who was with the deceased at the deceased’s house when the deceased was injured as a result of which he was taken to hospital.
In face of the above evidence, I find that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused. The accused has a case to answer and is placed to his defence.
Delivered, dated and signed in open court at Kakamega this 29th day of April, 2019.
J. NJAGI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Ondieki for accused
Mr. Ng’etich for State
Accused j- present
Court Assistant - George