[2015] KEHC 5723 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5723 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence, including eyewitness identification, forensic linkage of the firearm, and the post-mortem report confirming death by gunshot, pointed to the accused as the perpetrator of both the murder and the attempted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 5723 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Geoffrey Wafula Makoe
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 105 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling at Close of Prosecution's Case
Outcome
Accused found to have a case to answer and is required to make his defence.
Judges
LN Mutende
Legal Topics
Murder, Attempted Murder, Use of Firearms, Criminal Liability
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Attempted Murder Use of Firearms Criminal Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Geoffrey Wafula Makoe

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling at Close of Prosecution's Case

  1. 1 Whether the accused caused the death of Isaac Ndunda Muli by an unlawful act.
  2. 2 Whether the accused attempted to murder Munyao Ikulumi.
  3. 3 Whether there is sufficient evidence to require the accused to make a defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence, including eyewitness identification, forensic linkage of the firearm, and the post-mortem report confirming death by gunshot, pointed to the accused as the perpetrator of both the murder and the attempted murder. Consequently, the accused is required to address the court in his defence as mandated by Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Accused found to have a case to answer and is required to make his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is required to address the court in his defence pursuant to Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.