[2015] KEHC 3409 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, George Kimani Waruiru. As a result, the court ruled that the accused should be placed on his defence in accordance with the requirements of criminal procedure, which mandates that an accused be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 3409 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Defendant: George Kimani Waruiru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 73 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused placed on his defence.
- Judges
- CJ Kendagor
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
George Kimani Waruiru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant being put on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, George Kimani Waruiru. As a result, the court ruled that the accused should be placed on his defence in accordance with the requirements of criminal procedure, which mandates that an accused be called upon to answer the case if the prosecution's evidence meets the threshold for a prima facie case.
Court Disposition
Accused placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is placed on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 73 OF 2010
LESIIT, J
REPUBLIC...................................................PROSECUTOR
-VERSUS -
GEORGE KIMANI WARUIRU...............................ACCUSED
RULING
1. I have considered the entire evidence adduced by the prosecution in this case and I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established against the accused in this case.
2. Accordingly I place the accused person on his defence.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 9THDAY OFJULY, 2015.
LESIIT, J.
JUDGE