[2021] KEHC 1696 (KLR)
The court considered the gravity of the offence, the circumstances leading to the deceased's death, the accused's conduct as detailed in the probation report, and the negative attitude of both the family and community towards the accused. The court also weighed the mitigating factors presented by the defence,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 1696 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: George Morara Oroba
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 47 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction for Murder
- Outcome
- accused sentenced to forty years imprisonment for murder
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation, Probation Reports, Community Attitude, Right of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
George Morara Oroba
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction for Murder
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused convicted of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether mitigating factors and the probation report warrant a sentence less than death or life imprisonment.
- 3 Whether the accused's alleged terminal illness should affect the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the gravity of the offence, the circumstances leading to the deceased's death, the accused's conduct as detailed in the probation report, and the negative attitude of both the family and community towards the accused. The court also weighed the mitigating factors presented by the defence, including the accused's alleged remorse, time spent in custody, and family responsibilities. However, the court found no proof of the alleged terminal illness and determined that a non-custodial sentence was unsuitable given the seriousness of the offence and the risk to the community. Guided by the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the court exercised discretion to impose a...
Court Disposition
accused sentenced to forty years imprisonment for murder
Orders
- The accused, George Morara Oroba, is sentenced to serve forty (40) years imprisonment from the date of sentence.
- The accused has a right of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE (MURDER) NO 47 OF 2019
REPUBLIC..............................................................PROSECUTOR
-VERSUS-
GEORGE MORARA OROBA......................................ACCUSED
RULING ON SENTENCE
1. On 22. 10. 2021 the accused person herein George Morara Orobawas found guilty of the offence of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Codeand this court convicted him accordingly. I sought a presentence report which has been tendered in court. His lawyer mitigated. The prosecution indicated that the accused is a first offender.
2. The probation report filed on the 9/11/21 states that; the accused is known to be a nuisance, a thief and murderer and extortionist in the community. He is not suffering from any terminal disease. He drinks alcohol and abuses drugs. The home environment is not conducive for his release and rehabilitation. The family attitude is that releasing the accused will cause more harm to the family and even his life will be no more and they request for a life sentence. The community attitude is that the accused deserves a life sentence for the safety of Rioma people. The victim’s father has requested for a life sentence. The reports indicates that the accused is 50 years old and that he is a serial offender as per his family and community. That his brother a police officer attached in Ngong Nairobi gave various crimes where he was convicted although he could not recall the file numbers, they range from year 2002 to 2016 when the one of assaulting the mother was withdrawn. That the deceased was his first wife and they have 4 children. It is recommended that the accused be given a life sentence as the community is negative about him and they vowed to lynch him if he is released.
3. Mr. Kimaiyo for the accused stated as follows in mitigation; that the accused is remorseful, he has been in custody for over 2 years. He has learnt a lot and he has reformed. He has young children and that the said children and his other wife depend on him. That he is suffering from a terminal disease and seeks a lenient sentence.
4. I note that an innocent life was lost. The accused was determined to cause grievous harm to deceased which led to her death. He thereafter disposed of the body by burying it in a pit latrine. The accused is said to be a nuisance and of bad conduct both in his home and the community. His relatives want nothing to do with him. The probation report details his conduct and recommends a life sentence.
5. I have taken into account the following the circumstances that lead to the death of the deceased, the time the accused has been in custody, the decision of the Supreme Court in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Anor v Republic (2017) e KLR, the mitigating factors submitted by counsel, the Probation officer’s report incorporating the attitude of the offender and that of the community and the victim’s family and the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines. Punishment for a person convicted of murder is death. In my view a non-custodial sentence is not suitable. Though it is stated that the accused suffers from a terminal illness there was no proof of such an illness.
6. I hereby sentence the accused person George Morara Oroba to serve forty (40) years imprisonment from the date of sentence. The accused has a right of appeal.
Dated, SignedandDeliveredatKisiithis16thday ofNovember 2021
R. E. OUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
George Morara Oroba Accused Present
Mr. Kimaiyo For the Accused
Mr. Kaino State Counsel ODPP
Ms Rael Court Assistant