[2017] KEHC 5840 (KLR)
The court found that the accused was guilty of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code, based on the evidence that he caused the fatal burns leading to the deceased's death. Despite the accused's status as a first offender, his remorse, and positive character references, the court held that the law...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 5840 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: George Ndungu Mwangi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 16 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing and Verdict
- Outcome
- Accused convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
- Judges
- DB Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Sentences, Death Penalty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
George Ndungu Mwangi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing and Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is guilty of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether the mandatory death sentence under section 204 of the Penal Code should be imposed.
- 3 Whether there are exceptional circumstances to depart from the mandatory sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused was guilty of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code, based on the evidence that he caused the fatal burns leading to the deceased's death. Despite the accused's status as a first offender, his remorse, and positive character references, the court held that the law prescribes a mandatory death sentence for murder under section 204 of the Penal Code. The judge emphasized that there were no exceptional circumstances to justify departing from the mandatory sentence. The court acknowledged the tension between sentencing principles and mandatory sentences but concluded that the death penalty remains constitutional and lawful for murder in Kenya....
Court Disposition
Accused convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
Orders
- The accused, George Ndungu Mwangi, shall suffer death as provided for under section 204 of the Penal Code for the offence of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAJIADO
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 16 OF 2015
REPUBLIC......................................................................PROSECUTOR
Versus
GEORGE NDUNGU MWANGI...............................................ACCUSED
SENTENCE REMARKS AND VERDICT
George Ndungu Mwangi, you were convicted of the offence of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code punishable under section 204 of the same code. The brief facts disclosed by the prosecution were that prior to Nkuruna Kasatwa’s death he was your supervisor in a farm where you worked as a charcoal burner. The evidence also revealed that you lived together in the same house while the deceased was away from his family home.
This fatal day on 6/11/2014 was just like any other day for both of you when in the early hours of the day you visited the deceased home. In your short visit you and the deceased also left together. The next time the relatives of the deceased heard of him was when you reported to PW1 that he has suffered serious burns and required medical treatment. The arrangements were made to take the deceased to the hospital where unfortunately he succumbed to death due to the injuries incurred on 10/11/2014. As a recital of the findings of the pathologist the extensive and serious burns were consistent with the cause of death.
I now proceed to sentence you. The pre-sentence report indicates that you are middle aged at 45 years in a family of 13 siblings. The family and the community interviewed gave a favourable report on your character and hard work to generate financial resources to support yourself and family. The victim impact statement alluded by a brother to the deceased one Kezwe Nkuruna. To them the deceased was a brother, husband and companion to many. During his life time the deceased who was aged about 56 years was married and blessed with eight children. Their concern was that the loss caused by your actions has left a gap which will not be filled more specifically loss of dependency for his family. In mitigation Mr. Sekento your advocate submitted on your behalf that you did not intend to kill the deceased whom you enjoyed cordial relationship.
On the part of Mr. Alex for the state you have no previous criminal record and hence you should be treated as a first offender. Before passing sentence I reiterate the fundamental principles of sentencing. I have in mind the sentencing guidelines launched by the judiciary to assist the judges/magistrates while exercising discretion on sentence. I consider the following three to be fundamental; the principle of proportionality. This principle encompasses seriousness of the crime, the need for just punishment, deterrence and where appropriate the need to protect the public and the victim. The sentence should be crafted to enable rehabilitation/reformation of the offender. Thirdly in passing the sentence it should be borne in mind no sentence should be greater that necessary which I prefer to call harsh and excessive in exercising discretion. In the present case I will bear this in mind.
I have taken into account that you are a first offender and also the mitigation of being remorseful of committing the offence. However I note that the offence of which you were convicted provides for a mandatory sentence of death penalty under section 204 of the Penal Code. The mandatory sentence does reflect the legislative intent to limit judicial discretion for serious offences like the one you were found guilty and convicted. There are no exceptional circumstances to make me depart from passing the mandatory sentence.
I do also find that some of the principles of sentencing run in contrast with the mandatory sentences but that as it may be death sentence is constitutional and lawful sentence in our country. That is the sentence I pass for this offence that you suffer death as provided for under section 204 of the Penal Code for the offence of murder contrary to section 203 of the same code.
Dated, delivered and signed in open court at Kajiado on 21st day of April, 2017.
.........................
R. NYAKUNDI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Sekento for accused present
Mr. Akula for Director of Public Prosecutions present
Mr. Mateli Court Assistant
Accused present