[2017] KEHC 271 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 271 (KLR)

The court, after reviewing the evidence presented by the prosecution, found that a prima facie case had been established against the accused. This finding means that the evidence, if uncontroverted, would warrant a conviction. Therefore, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with Section...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 271 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: George Odhiambo Ouoma
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 2 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Outcome
Accused put on his defence.
Judges
AC Mrima
Legal Topics
Murder Trial, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Trial Case to Answer Criminal Procedure Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

George Odhiambo Ouoma

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to require him to be put on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court, after reviewing the evidence presented by the prosecution, found that a prima facie case had been established against the accused. This finding means that the evidence, if uncontroverted, would warrant a conviction. Therefore, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Accused put on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is hereby put on his defence pursuant to Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.