[2010] KEHC 1989 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 1989 (KLR)

The court found that the Gichugu Land Disputes Tribunal acted in excess of its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to cancel the joint title deed of the ex-parte applicant and the third respondent. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act restricts the tribunal's jurisdiction to matters of boundary,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 1989 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Gichugu Division Land Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: Kerugoya Resident Magistrate; Respondent: Gathumbi Gatonya; Respondent: Monica Njoki Gathumbi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 146 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari
Outcome
Application allowed. Tribunal award and magistrate's adoption quashed.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Certiorari, Quashing of Tribunal Award, Registered Land, Title Deed Cancellation
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal Certiorari Quashing of Tribunal Award Registered Land Title Deed Cancellation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Gichugu Division Land Disputes Tribunal

Respondent

Kerugoya Resident Magistrate

Respondent

Gathumbi Gatonya

Respondent

Monica Njoki Gathumbi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari

  1. 1 Whether the Gichugu Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to order the cancellation of a joint title deed for registered land.
  2. 2 Whether the award and subsequent adoption by the magistrate's court should be quashed for want of jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Gichugu Land Disputes Tribunal acted in excess of its statutory jurisdiction by purporting to cancel the joint title deed of the ex-parte applicant and the third respondent. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act restricts the tribunal's jurisdiction to matters of boundary, occupation, and trespass, and expressly excludes determination of ownership or cancellation of title to registered land. The tribunal's award, and its subsequent adoption as a judgment by the Kerugoya Resident Magistrate, were therefore nullities. The court allowed the application for certiorari, quashed the tribunal's decision, and ordered that each party bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Tribunal award and magistrate's adoption quashed.

Orders

  • The decision of the Gichugu Land Disputes Tribunal and the subsequent order of the Kerugoya Resident Magistrate adopting the award as judgment are hereby quashed.
  • Each party will bear its own costs.