[2020] KEHC 363 (KLR)
The court found that the minor accused had been in custody for an extended period due to inability to meet the bail terms previously set. The court considered the probation report, the lack of opposition from the prosecution, the willingness of the family to stand surety, and the absence of any security or flight...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 363 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Defendant: Grace Muthoni Ndambiri; Defendant: RMN
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 1 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Murder Case / Ruling on Application to Vary Bail Terms
- Outcome
- application for variation of bail terms allowed
- Judges
- JK Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Bail Variation, Juvenile Accused, Remand Conditions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Grace Muthoni Ndambiri
Defendant
RMN
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Murder Case / Ruling on Application to Vary Bail Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bail terms previously set for the minor accused should be varied due to inability to comply.
- 2 Whether continued remand of the minor accused is justified given his age and circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the minor accused had been in custody for an extended period due to inability to meet the bail terms previously set. The court considered the probation report, the lack of opposition from the prosecution, the willingness of the family to stand surety, and the absence of any security or flight risk as assessed by the community and victim's family. The court held that continued remand was not justified and that the bail terms should be varied to ensure the minor's release, in line with constitutional and statutory protections for children.
Court Disposition
application for variation of bail terms allowed
Orders
- The 2nd accused shall sign a free bond, with two sureties.
- The 2nd accused shall undertake to attend court whenever required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KERUGOYA
MURDER CASE NO. 1 OF 2019
REPUBLIC.....................................RESPONDENT
– VS –
GRACE MUTHONI NDAMBIRI..1ST ACCUSED
RMN …………………….…..…… 2ND ACCUSED
RULING
1. By a Notice of Motion dated the 19/10/2020, the 2nd accused who is charged with the offence of murder, with the 1st accused, seeks variation of bail terms given by the court on the 6/11/2019. The bail terms were that each accused person be released upon signing a bond of Kshs 500,000/- plus one surety of similar amount.
2. The 1st accused complied with the bond terms, and was released. The Applicant/Second accused is a minor. At time of the alleged commission of the offence, he was 15 years old. He is now 17 years old. The 1st accused is his mother. He has been in remand since the 25/1/2019 when he was charged. He was a Form Two Secondary School student.
3. I have considered the probation report on the accused. It is dated 5/9/2019. There is no doubt that the court (Gitari J) considered the said report when it gave the bail/bond terms on the 6/11/2019.
4. I have noted that the Community and the family of the victim do not regard the accused minor as a security or flight risk, but leaves the matter of bail to the court’s discretion. Though the accused’s family is willing to stand surety for him, it is unable to meet the terms of bond set by the court on the 6/11/2019. It is noted that the Co-accused, the 1st accused and mother of the applicant was able to secure her release on bail.
5. The prosecution is not opposed to variation of bail/bond terms, and leaves the court to exercise its discretion in that regard.
6. UPON consideration of the circumstances, and the fact that the minor has been in custody since his arrest in January 2019, I am persuaded to vary the bail terms as follows:-
1. The 2nd accused shall sign a free bond, with two sureties.
2. He shall undertake to attend court whenever required.
3. He shall not interfere with witnesses.
4. He shall not leave the court’s jurisdiction during the pendency of the case i.e Kirinyaga County.
Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kerugoya this 12th November, 2020.
J. N. MULWA
JUDGE