[2024] KEHC 6796 (KLR)
The court found that although the key witness, a minor and the accused's son, had already testified, the accused's lack of a fixed abode and origin from the Kenya/Ethiopia border presented a significant risk of flight. The court also noted its inability to supervise the accused's access to the minor witness, who...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 6796 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Adan Hassan
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Voi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E007 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail denied; accused to remain in custody pending trial.
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Flight Risk, Compelling Reasons, Constitutional Rights, Witness Protection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Adan Hassan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there exist compelling reasons to deny the accused bail, specifically risk of flight and potential harm to a key witness.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the key witness, a minor and the accused's son, had already testified, the accused's lack of a fixed abode and origin from the Kenya/Ethiopia border presented a significant risk of flight. The court also noted its inability to supervise the accused's access to the minor witness, who remains vulnerable. These factors constituted compelling reasons to deny bail under Article 49(h) of the Constitution. The probability of the accused absconding outweighed his constitutional right to bail in the circumstances of this case.
Court Disposition
Bail denied; accused to remain in custody pending trial.
Orders
- The application for bail/bond by the accused is declined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Republic v Hassan (Criminal Case E007 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 6796 (KLR) (15 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6796 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Voi
Criminal Case E007 of 2023
GMA Dulu, J
May 15, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Adan Hassan
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused herein, through defence counsel Mr. Mwanyumba has asked for bail pending trial. Defence counsel has emphasized that the key witness in the case, a minor son of the accused person, has now already testified.
2. The Prosecuting Counsel Mr. Sirima on the other hand, has objected to the release of the accused person on bail on the ground that the accused person who comes from the Kenyan/Ethiopia border has with no fixed abode, and is thus a flight risk. Counsel has also submitted that if released the accused person is likely to harm the key witness, his minor son, and relied on the affidavit in opposition to bail sworn by the investigating officer Cpl. David Kiprop Langat on 14th February 2024.
3. I have considered the application and opposition thereto. Bail/bond is a constitutional right and is applicable to all offences, serious or not serious. Article 49(h) of the Constitution provides that every arrested person has a right to be released on bail/bond unless there exist compelling reasons for denial of the same.
4. Each case has to be considered on its own merits and peculiar facts.
5. In the present case, there is no contest that the key witness who has already testified is a child of the accused person. He is presently in the custody of relatives, but this court cannot supervise the access of the accused person to the said child of tender years.
6. It is also not contested that the accused person comes from the border area between Kenya and Ethiopia. It is also not contested that presently he has no fixed abode in Voi, and it is not known what engagement would keep him in Voi.
7. In those circumstances, I find the probability of the accused person being a flight risk to be a compelling reason for denial of bail/bond herein.
8. I thus decline to grant the accused person bail/bond.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY 2024 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI.GEORGE DULUJUDGEIn the presence of:-Alfred – Court AssistantMr. Sirima for StateMr. Mwanyumba for the accusedAccused