[2009] KEHC 2846 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 2846 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant conceded, both in the grounds of the application and in the supporting affidavit, that the Notice of Motion for judicial review was filed out of time and without leave of the court. The application to extend time was itself an admission of this procedural defect. The court held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 2846 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Tongaren Land Disputes Tribunal (Hudson Watima & 4 others); Respondent: SRM, Kimilili Court; Interested Party: Emmanuel W. Wanyonyi; Applicant: John Barasa Plandu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 2 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application to Extend Time for Judicial Review
Outcome
application struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time without leave
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Timelines, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Natural Justice, Land Control Act Compliance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Judicial Review Timelines Tribunal Jurisdiction Natural Justice Land Control Act Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Tongaren Land Disputes Tribunal (Hudson Watima & 4 others)

Respondent

SRM, Kimilili Court

Respondent

Emmanuel W. Wanyonyi

Interested Party

John Barasa Plandu

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application to Extend Time for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the application for judicial review was filed out of time without leave of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the court should extend time to allow the late filing of the judicial review application.
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in making the impugned orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant conceded, both in the grounds of the application and in the supporting affidavit, that the Notice of Motion for judicial review was filed out of time and without leave of the court. The application to extend time was itself an admission of this procedural defect. The court held that the preliminary objection was well founded, as the law requires strict compliance with time limits for judicial review applications and does not permit the court to regularize an application already filed out of time without prior leave. Consequently, the application was fatally defective and incompetent, warranting its striking out with costs to the interested party.

Court Disposition

application struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time without leave

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 2nd January, 2008 is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the interested party.