https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7179
The applicant, through learned prosecution counsel, did not prosecute the application on the hearing date; accordingly, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and closed the file.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 7179 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; 1st Respondent: Hirab Sheikh Ibrahim; 2nd Respondent: Bilal Salat Hillow
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E076 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Revision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
- Judges
- ["DR Kavedza"]
- Legal Topics
- Revision of Court Orders, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Hirab Sheikh Ibrahim
1st Respondent
Bilal Salat Hillow
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for revision should be sustained when the applicant fails to prosecute it on the hearing date.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, through learned prosecution counsel, did not prosecute the application on the hearing date; accordingly, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and closed the file.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- File closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Republic v Ibrahim & another (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E076 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 7179 (KLR) (26 May 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 7179 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Kibera Miscellaneous Criminal Application E076 of 2026 DR Kavedza, J May 26, 2026 Between Republic Applicant and Hirab Sheikh Ibrahim 1st Respondent Bilal Salat Hillow 2nd Respondent Ruling 1.The applicants vide a letter dated 25th May 2026 made an application for revision of the orders of this court. Directions were issued and the matter set down for hearing on 26th May 2026. 2.On the said date, the applicants through learned prosecution counsel did not prosecute the application. 3.In the premises, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.File closed. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY ON THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2026D. KAVEDZAJUDGE